Two shores of Anguita and Podemos | Opinion
Julio Anguita said there were two shores. One, neoliberalism; Another, his enemies. The second is remaining united and if he respects its acronim, it may be PSOE; But these, these are the heritage of the time made by the Centenary Party revolutions, should not be safe for the automatic agreement. The contract should be able to occur or not, and if it is given, the company should rely on programmatic commitments. IU had to lose fear of being responsible for ruling the right.And do “clamp” with pp – if it does not. The real combination of the PSOA of Ajnar’s PP and Gonzalez, the rival theorists, but the agents of the Neolberization are not the same, but a tendel, a tendel, in which the Angutistas in Asturias is ridiculous.
The fate of this strategy is different. He led the IU to record the results, but also caused internal tensions and division: the new left, which is incorporated into the PSOE. And good results were dissolved after 1996. Anguta resigned in 2000 And then came an IU, which recovered good harmony with the socialist party, which is greater than ever; For the rest, the reunion is no longer launched, Roldon and Intaxourrondo, but homosexual marriage and historical memory law. But the story was running and the 2008 crisis came, the cuts and finally 15-your and Podemos, with a new equality speech of two parts bilateral. It is full of back The open presence of Egg Eguta, respected by its rough and moral Rocky And cassandra, in the middle of the debris of the Berlin wall, less than nineties, engraved a series of ignored warnings, now fulfilled and drawn a way.
After his death, in 2020, the devotion became intensified, Anuputa was broken from her and used to legalize it, and freed from the ballast of the possibility that she tried to sink. They disappointed their relatives with Pablo Iglessis; But, the dead, he could no longer express him or move from his throne, the formation of purple, his legal myth. Before each new confusion, after each new turn, the question What does Anaguta doAnd the answer is to decide what to do.
Today we can divide the new lecture of the two shores, not just Neolibalism, but with war. “Belicism” was launched on one shore and on another peace, in the same simple way; We are its unique swimmer, put hands from her, put hands from her and take you to the mouth to invite you to sink on the opposite shore, but they will not just feel comfortable. “Julio Anaguta we have been asked many times to think on two shores. Iren Montero explains that the two shores are war and peace today, and the goal is clear: the United Left, in the death of a very declining platform – and pulling the candidate led by Montero/Belarra Tandem. They are not likely to get it, because there are very few people who do not distrust podemos in IU, or Unlike their Diesels – such as plastering a tribute to Anguiah. IU was born against NATO: There is no recognition, no less discussion; This coalition has many “worlds”, Marxist or Christian socialists, federation or centralists, governors or movements; He also has Carlists, but the fan’s nail Atlantic Alliance denies.
The world of Spain and 2025 was very different by 1996, reflecting those who reject these teachings. Anupatismo’s right to rule Ajnar “Journey to the Center”, which praised Azana: The right of knowing if Ajnar comes only after. Ramiro cites Ledesma on the right of the intestinal wars on the right of the right, saves and restores the fascist monuments, Palestinian genocide is praised And it is a friend of governments who ban or dynamite the welfare state of pride. The PSOE government, which fought in the ninety, also broke the UGT of Nicholas Redo; Current, good or worse, the last progressive island of Europe, and “a slotterhouse shape, or one of the planet’s size,” The sentence of the mori Fall years. We are not hitting Doberman, but the dinosaur behind the rear.
