In support of the Waqf law, 7 states have taken the attitude of the Supreme Court, and know what your arguments said – the seven states Waqf law in the Supreme Court; What are their arguments
Waqf legal support
Waqf law In the Supreme Court- On the one hand, the seven states have moved the Supreme Court to support it as the time of political and demonstrations on the Waqf Amendment is underway. Several petitions have been filed by many political parties and Muslim organizations that challenge the Waqf amendment in the Supreme Court. At the same time, seven states have approached the Supreme Court in favor of the law and demanded that their arguments be kept before the court. These states argue that the law introduces significant reforms with the management and regulation of Waqf assets, increasing transparency and ensuring better management.
State arguments
Madhya Pradesh: The state government has argued that the constitutional objections raised in this case have discriminatory behavior, arbitrary and no basis, which must be rejected early. In addition, it stated that the law would bring in adequate improvement in the management and regulations of Waqf assets by increasing transparency, accountability and administrative system.
Chhattisgarh: According to Chhattisgarh’s argument, the purpose of this law is to further cover the Waqf Board, including representing the various Muslim sections of the best Waqf rule and administration. The government says the Waqf law creates an obvious and responsible system for the Waqf administration and aims to bring about a change in managing the Waqf attributes.
Assam: The state government has stated that the newly added section 3E prohibits the announcement of any land in the planned or tribal areas (fifth table or sixth table). Under the sixth schedule of the Constitution, Assam has eight of 35 administrative districts.
Rajasthan: The government has said that it is not only constitutionally strong and discriminated against, but also based on the values of transparency, integrity and accountability, and protects public interests, including religious arrangements. Rajasthan’s petition states that the law does not hold any religious group or discriminate. This only determines the right legal structure to prevent illegal claims.
In addition, Maharashtra, Haryana and Uttarakhand have also filed an application, and the amendment law expects a regulated, technical and legally strong structure to manage Waqf assets. At the same time, socio-economic development has been promoted to beneficiaries.
Country and the world’s latest news (There is no message) Read more in Hindi, all the big messages Times now Navbarath Live TV But. Nation (India news) Updates and elections (Elections) The Times is now related to the latest news.
