Victim to the abuse of condemning Cardinal Sipriya who saw him in Rome: “The message is that the Pope died and the party returns” | International

Peruvian Cardinal, Juan Louis Sipriyani in 2018, was outraged by the man who abused him in his childhood in 1983 His presence in the Vatican in the preparations of Kklave And seeing the Holy Sea actions. Pope Francis, As the country has revealed In January last January, he felt reliable, separated him from Lima’s archbishop in 2019 and imposed a criminal formation: he forced him to the boycott of Peru, banned him scenes and public statements and carried cardinal symbols. However, last week, Sipriya appeared in Rome, visited the cardinal dressed cardinal, and then went to his grave with the rest of the purpurated and even participated in general compounds. “The message is that the Pope died and the party returns,” the Peruvian citizen laments, asks not to reveal his identity.

This case places one of the central issues of the Kklave on the table, as it recognizes the command of the last three pops: what is the attitude of the church with the next Ponnif with the victims of Pedophilia and the victims of sexual aggression. This is because the conflict of Sipriyani’s disobedience towards the late Ponnif has been growing for several days and both cardinals and the Vatican have been silent.

“It was surprising that he was seen in Rome, because he thought he could not appear in public activities, and it was outrageous to see him in the Cardinal’s clothing, and ignored all the grant he received and signed. He was mocking the church.” “Pope believes that a void believes in a void with death and that this person is in the house, when he is punished, and moving with extraordinary importance, now that it is not the potato, which is the earth and what he wants.” The newspaper consulted with Cardinal Sipriya three days ago, to find out its version of what’s happening and not yet answered.

Certainly, one of the reasons for writing this Peruvian to the Pope in 2018 is the agony he experienced in the 2013 KCCLAE when he thought Sipriya could be chosen into the Pope to tell him his story. Now he has seen the appearance again as he will be going on since May 7. In fact, Francisco banned Sipriya from attending the next conclav, but when the veto arrived, Peruvian Cardinal was already 81 years old, and it was overcome as the 80s lose that right.

The complainant wrote a letter to the Pope in 2018 with the story of abuse he had experienced in 1983. He did not want any compensation, he separated Sipriya. Francisco was involved in person, who was the only way to seriously consider complaints to the church in these years: he began an investigation to a priest with his faith in Lima and later gave credibility to the accusation. He is going to go to 75 years in January 2019 in January 2019, in which the bishops must show their resignation, accept immediately, and not let him follow for a few years. In addition, he has imposed restrictions on the signing document that accepts the cardinal himself. Everything was secret until the newspaper revealed. But now this person punishes the Vatican, the punishment looks like the past water: “The cardinals in Rome do the way they don’t see, and more than 100. It is not incredible.”

The Vatican has escaped to clarify the case these days: the concrete granted concrete details of the Cipriya, whether it breaks down, if any cardinal problem is raised, if the Cardinal College is discussing this problem, if it is going to take any measurement. There is no place about it.

Despite three consecutive days of journalists in a daily meeting with the media, Vatican Press Room Director Matio Bruni said on Wednesday that “this case is known” and, according to the rules, are invited to attend the previous meetings of all Cardinals Conference. About the rest, he said that he had no more information and suggesting to add For the announcement released in the Vatican JanuaryAfter the information of this newspaper. He confirmed that Sipriya had imposed a criminal principle with some disciplinary actions regarding his public activities, dwelling and the use of badges. ” And he said the formula is still in effect.

However, Sipriya has already made public demonstrations and returned to Peru. In January he went to Lima, where he attended a public tribute, and Mayor Rafael Lopez, a member of the Opus De, received the city’s gold medal from Aliaga. After publishing the news of the newspaper, he defended his innocence, publishing many letters that these allegations were false and attacking the Pope, For him to “hear him”. He also entered the intersection of public missives with the episcopal conference of Peru (CEP), which issued a strict statement in support of the victim and advised him to “refuse in vain justifications, stubbornness and truth.” The last letter to Sipriya CEP came from March, where he insisted and asked for his innocence. On April 7, the presidency of Peruvian Bishops reminded him that he had not forgotten that he was “behaved with a gentle religious charity and that he had not forgotten that he had not forgotten and reiterated his proximity to the victims.” Cardinal of Lima and CEP president Carlos Castillo in Rome are also well aware of this and can explain to the rest of his peers.

The person who blamed him was unbearable, and after writing to the Pope, there were many pressures and threats to write another letter he withdrawn. It has recently been in the insue for cooperation in cleaning Sipriya’s image. “By most media he was able to apologize and use it for the Holy Father at that time.

Now, after the death of the Pope, Sipriya has clearly evolved to refuse to adhere to his punishment. “There was that confusion in the church. On the one hand to say one thing, and on the other hand he does and what he wants and gives the versions completely alien to the truth and on the contrary.” Whatever the expectation of cardinals is, they explain, they take action and make the situation clear: “This thing must be resolved and you have to send a clear and direct message.” He believes that Sipriya does not accept the punishment of the Pope and upholds his innocence – a criminal formula is a great imposed order – the Vatican can be canonically processing and eventually the UMES can be UMES.

He is Jesuta Hans Jolner. Country.

The American D -Denucation Organization Bishops, who has the world’s largest database on this scandal, has demanded accountability and sanctity to look: “It is disturbing what the participation of Sipriyani will disclose the dysfunction of the Vatican, even when they work (…).