United States Trade Court Annals Trump’s tariffs | International

Donald Trump on Wednesday suffered a great judicial wand of his second term as president. The United States International Trade Court, which is a special jurisdiction in the field, has illegally declared general tariffs for imports imposed by Trump under the Emergency Powers Act. In practice, the decision jumps through the air A generalized trade war. Markets have been sentenced because the tariffs are threatened by the United States and the reason for the increase in prices.

The Trump government has already announced that the sentence issued by the court of three judges will be appointed. In principle, the appeal should be submitted before the Federal Court of Appeals, but the case can be reached to the Supreme Court, and he has a large number of six conservative judges against three progressive judges. Occurred after failure Many demands have argued that Trump has attacked Congress powers, He exceeded his authority, leaving the trade policy with the kindness of his likes and humor changes and unraveling the economic confusion.

The court’s decision in New York has declared illegal and most of the tariffs decided by Trump has 25% taxes for Canada and Mexico and 20% to China with fentanil and immigration excuse and false “mutual tariffs”. Normalized in 10% after the President was corrected And give a partial negotiation 90 days before the markets pressure. It does not enter 25% of tariffs on the import of steel, aluminum, vehicles and parts.

“Challenged tariff orders are canceled and their application is permanently banned. This is not a precautionary measure that is accurately adopted by the circumstances; if the challenge orders are illegal to the arguments, if they are all, they are all,” three judges ended.

“The question arising in both cases before the court is that the International Emergency Powers Act (IEPA) has been entrusted with these powers to the president. “The court does not understand that IEEPA provides such unlimited authority and unleash the tariff taxes challenged under it,” he said.

The ability to impose tariffs in general is not the president, in accordance with the Congress. When emphasizing that the trigger should be “unusual and unusual threat”, IEEPA allows the president to control imports and exports in response to some non -war emergency.

Trump has accepted various statements of the national emergency conditions and then used them to attribute power to tax imports in a very debated commentary on the law that the International Trade Court is not considered acceptable. Since the announcement of the law, no other president has not used IEEPA to impose tariffs like Trump in five decades.

Import rates Dozen democratic states have appealed them before the International Trade Court In case of a group of companies that claim to have faced financial compensation through tariffs (you are options, Genoa Pipe, Microcks, Fishusa and Terra Cycling) on ​​behalf of the Liberty Justice Center. In both cases the sentence is common.

“Constitutional”

On the one hand, the judges analyze the world tariffs and returners, ie revenge to other countries and, on the other hand, the drug trafficking and the entry of immigrants.

They are of the opinion that the law gives the President the powers in the emergency of “trade” in terms of world and retirement tariffs. In some cases, it can be done with tariffs, but in any interpretation that is in favor of the principles that separate the powers of non -delegation, based and important issues, do not give power as world tariffs or revenue. ” They are punished that “any commentary of IEEPA that delegates unlimited tariff power is unconstitutional.”

On the other hand, the traffic or immigrants’ entry into the traffic or immigrants in the case of Trump’s specific tariffs is that the judges argue that such taxes are “legal and unusual to deal with” an unusual and extraordinary threat. ”

The judges say that taxes on legally imported goods are not useful to “deal with” immigration or drug trafficking problems. They do not consider the Trump government a valid argument that tariffs can solve these problems by stressing pressure to the Mexico, Canada and China governments. “Orders have to deal with that specific problem, do not create a ‘lever’ to do so.” If Trump accepts the indirect pressure argument, “Then everything is allowed.” Judges do not argue that this strategy can be effective and functional, but it is not allowed by law.

“The court claims that the IEEPA does not authorize the global tariff orders, with turns or traffic (immigrants or drugs).” “The IEEPA president has exceeded any power granted to the president to control imports by the world tariff orders and turns. Tariffs against traffic are not valid, because they do not address the threats established in the mentioned orders,” says the resolution.

This decision is probably a great setback that Trump has experienced so far in the courts during his second tenure, in which the president is testing the limits of the president’s authority in his official flow.

One of the demands was presented by a dozen democratic states led by New York in April. They considered Trump The unprecedented tax rise is illegal For Americans, to skip Congress power. “We are demanding that the Trump administration is its tariff political funniest and we have won!” New York Governor, Kathi Hochul. “The tariff is just a secret tax. New York is struggling to stop these tariffs and give money to your pocket,” he said.

The White House spokesman said, “It is not in line with the selected judges to decide how to address the national emergency.” “The resrocal treatment of other countries to the United States has provided our country’s historical and persistent trade deficits,” said Kush Desai, a spokesman for Bloomberg cited. “These deficits have created a national emergency that has destroyed American societies, leaving our workers and weakening our industrial defense base, and the court is not questioning.”