Tunisia denies 40 opponents in prison for up to 66 years, after being referred to as a safe country to EU | International
The anti -terrorism court on Saturday imposed a great punishment issued in Tunisia in Machoonon against the opposition since the end of the president’s dictatorship Jin The Abidin Ben Ale In 2011. Four dozen party leaders, former high positions, intellectuals and businessmen have been sentenced to 13 to 66 years in prison, “conspiring against state security.” These are political individuals from the various currents with the general necklace who opposed the power of the president Kais, who closed the parliament in 2021.
Two years after the arrest, many defendants were in the bars, while others were released in the rebellion after fleeing the country. Among the previous ones, Social Democrat Jayam Turki Zaragoza, 60, is the Spanish Passport after the Spanish Civil War with the Spanish Passport, the Spanish Passport, who was sentenced to 48 years in prison.
The European Commission proposes Wednesday Include Tunisia in the list of “Safe Source” countries, That is, it is regarded as respecting human rights and without internal armed conflicts. This indicates that its citizens have some arguments for the borders of the EU states and for shelter. Brussels tries to “rationalize” the shelter policies before the downfall of the requests.
The Express Policy for the asylum demands processed in the EU in the maximum three months of human rights defender, warned that the migration agreement that has been implemented more than a year, suggesting that many applications are rejected by less guarantees in the processing of files.
He is Macrojion against the opposition According to EFE, it was developed in three inquiries behind the closed doors, without the physical presence of the respondents and access to the media and observers. NGO Human Rights Watch (HRW) denies that there is no minimal model of justice in this process, after reviewing the essence and allegations submitted on the respondents. HRW has warned about the growth of “arbitrary” arrests in Tunisia, and has been “severe” since the president’s claim that Parliament was abolished and control over the judiciary.
Los A series of political processes They have strengthened the siege, opposing the president, who ruled with totalitarian bias after being elected twice in the election, without entitlement opponents last October and 70% of the tyrannical biased. On February 5, Islamist leader Rachid Ganuchi, 83, the founder of the Ennahda Party, who voted in the 2019 legislative elections (40.7%), was the last of him before inquiring his ban in Tunis. Ginchi was sentenced to 22 years in prison, an additional 10 years in prison and was collected in the previous two judgments and for this, it was between 2023.
In 40 years of convicted, businessman Kamel Eltof, 68 years in prison, and former director of the Ennahda Party, Nuhedan Bhiri, 43 years. The top leader of Anti -Coalition National Salvation Front, Ahmed Nezib Chebbi was a fine of 18 years. French intellectual Bernard-Henry Levy was also sentenced to 18 years in prison, in which case he was safe in his country.
Opposition statistics include Islamists and secularists, socialists and conservatives. There is also an opposition coalition journalist and representative Chaima Issa. “We are facing a translucent system, the power of unheard, it does not respond and refuses to account,” Isa warned at the beginning. “Most of the 40 people are not aware of the trial. Some conservatives, other Islamists, and others on the left … how are they going to conspire? They are the only political adversaries of the president,” the defense team said.
The main allegations are based on the statement of two protected witnesses, whose identity does not reveal. Allegations of “conspiracy” arise in an invitation to lunch with Couscous at home Jayam Turki, This includes the Spanish ambassador and other Western diplomats, as well as Tunisian political and intellectual leaders continued to be common contacts, as weekly reported Young Africa.
One of the documents embedded in the summary is questioned by the president’s officialism, sometimes in the sarcastic voice and exits for political blockade, qualifying as a “road map for national conversation” by this protection, but the allegation is attributed to the performance of the Urdido plan for the security of the Urdido.
One of the defense respondents was consulted, “it is an irrelevant allegation for someone to meet with their country’s ambassador.” “There were allegations that they had been accused of forcing the government, but they found only the material to write in the records of their homes, no weapons …”, he was reversed.
