Trump insisted on protecting the end of the birth of birth a few hours after the Supreme Court. Immigration in the United States
The United States Supreme Court on Thursday celebrates a hearing on what is the greatest conflict of Donald Trump’s executive orders: The right to birth through birth. On his first day as president, the Magnate ordered the elimination of nationalism to children born in the United States, whose parents have been a constitution since 1868. The High Court does not need to pronounce whether Trump’s decree is constitutional, but he decides, but he decides, but he decides Three legal failures Illegal executive order can be applied to the entire national territory.
A few hours before this audience, Trump once again defended the move on his social network truth. “Citizenship does not conceive by the right of birth so that people who take vacation will become permanent citizens of the United States of America and bring their families with them,” they started their widespread message. According to the Republican, the law was approved for slave children after the civil war ended in 1895. “It has nothing to do with the illegal immigration of people who want to scam our country from our country and from all over the world.”
The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to resolve the issue as an necessity after the Federal Judges of Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington blocked the application of the order and failed to convert the constitution with the decree.
Government asks judges to limit the application Law failures For the suitable parties, the lower courts argue that the national presidential orders cannot be issued. The administration said that federal judges could only punish the rights of lawyers in the event of analyzing them. This appeal is confirmed as the courts used as “ratio of infection”, from the beginning of its second government, which prevented executive power from using its constitutional duties. “
The plaintiff argued that there was no reason for the Supreme Court ruling on whether universal judicial orders were always appropriate. In this case, they say that these failures are appropriate.
It is not clear when the High Court will decide, although it is possible to do so before the summer break, which usually begins in late June.
Although this is not the cause of the trial, the court decides whether the Constitution will give citizens to all those born in the US territory. If the Supreme Court is responsible for Trump, the sanctions of citizens at least 27 states will come into force.
Are different in the interpretation of the parties Fourteenth amendment, It directs that “all the natural people born in the United States, and are subject to their jurisdiction, the United States citizens and the citizens they live in.” The guarantee established in 1868, traditionally excludes the children of foreign diplomats and the children of foreign enemies during hostility.
Trump, however, defended that the expression of “subject to her jurisdiction” leaves children of unregistered immigrants. The president argues that non -citizens should obey another country with children born in the United States.
The first judge, Maryland’s magistrate John Couchnor, described the executive order as “negligently constitutional”.
Huge opposition
The businessman fulfilled his election promise and On the same day of his second tenure opening He signed an executive order to withdraw the right to children for children who do not have permanent legal status. Trump and his supporters argue that there should be more stringent standards to become an American citizen, which he called “precious and deep gift” in the executive order.
Reactions will be produced soon. The American Union for Civil Liberties (ACLU) is enough for a few minutes to file the first demand. Many states, civilians and pregnant women They challenged these orders in 10 different demands. Advocate experts questioned the president’s brave to challenge the right to think in the Constitution for more than 150 years, despite his announcement of many occasions. In 1868, in the then 37 US states, the 28th amendment was approved by the 28th, so that citizens did not refuse to be African descent or their children.
In the Wang Kim Arc case of 1898, the Supreme Court has already rejected Trump’s argument today a century ago. Officials have prevented the plaintiff’s born in the United States, but from Chinese parents and their son returned to their country. Therefore, when Wang wants to return, he has applied the law that has banned from entering Asian citizens. However, since he was born in his territory, the Supreme Court ruled that he was an American citizen.
If the presidential executive order comes into force, millions of children in the country live illegally, subject to the massive boycott of Tycoon’s immigration anti -crusade. OtherwiseThey are in a state of status, This is because there is no consulate to register those who have fled from countries without diplomatic relations like Venezuela.
A recent study of Think tank According to the Migration Policy Institute, the ending of citizens through birth shows that the unprocessed population will be increased by 2.7 million by 2045 and 5.4 million by 2075. Every year, 255,000 children born in the US land will investigate their life without citizenship due to their parents’ legal status.
Analytical authors wrote that this creation of a class residents born in the United States from the rights of their neighbors, classmates and work colleagues can sow the seeds that cause financial mobility and social integration in the coming years and in decades. ”
