Philip Martin’s STF | The procedure should follow the judgment complained against him in
Federal Supreme Court (STF) minister Alexander de Mores, who was authorized on 17th and 17th, was following former President Jair Bolsonoro (PL) former special adviser Philipa Martins.
Philip part of the second core of the report of the Attorney General Office (PGR) by Koop D’Tat after the 2022 election. The hearing will be held next Tuesday and Wednesday, April 22 and 23 in the first class of the court, in Brassilia.
The Mores decision is in line with the former advisor’s request, as he is in line with precautionary measures, requires legal authority to leave where he lives, in Ponta Grasa (PR).
“In the central actions of the process, not only accepting the existence of the accused, but also in favor of public order and procedural teaching, not only inspiring, especially when there is no history of danger, avoidance, obstacle or consent,” said his lawyers.
The defense will tell him to board a flight to Brassilia on Monday and return on Thursday 24 and where he will be. It also makes an exception about the media coverage of the session.
As part of precautionary measures, Philip cannot participate in social networks. In the case of “images or records of another nature of another nature of the third parties, lawyers are asked not to be responsible for him, as it is a judgment in the open session and the media coverage.
Earlier this month, Philipa Martin’s Minister Alexandre de Mores was fined at $ 20,000 for appearing in a video published by his lawyer, retired judge Sebastio Koelho, social networks. Protection appealed.
Another one of the Nuclius 2, former Director General of the Federal Highway Police (PRF), Silveni Vascus, requested the authority to follow the analysis next week, but attended.
When the reporter Mores calls for clarity on where the silvine is in Bracelia, the protection request is to be withdrawn. The allegation is that the Supreme Court is likely to understand that the media and image exposure of the trial and the precautionary measures have failed.
“It is true that the journals are attending the journals in a designated place for solemnity, therefore, aimed at preventing any damage to the integrity of precaution, and that it is a very appropriate measure for their attendance.”
The central judgment reported by the PGR by the rebellion:
Nucleus 1: The complaint was agreed on March 26; Nucleus 2: April 22 and 23 was judged; The judgment was scheduled on Nuclius 3: May 20 and 21; Nucleus 4: The verdict for May 6 and 7 is scheduled.
