The UGT Council of Europe has sought to demand Spanish removal version for dismissal | The economy

The UGT is putting pressure to the government to resolve the union version Compensation for incorrect dismissal. The Council submitted a letter intended to the Council of Europe this Thursday, in which the country has access, in which the European Social Rights Committee (CEDS) has said that the “effective executive measures of the Spanish state”. The body, based on the Council of Europe, said last year’s Spain Failure to suit the European Social Charter With its provisions on compensation for unauthorized removal.

“The state of Spanish state, especially by the Legislature, but by the Legislature, but also the executive and jurisdiction of the executive and jurisdiction, is responsible for effective consent and without delaying the responsibilities set out on the European social charter,” Pepe Olvarez said.

The state of Spanish represents an important decision of the request for effective implementation measures March 20, 2024 And recommended of the same organ The same year November 27Demanding effective fulfillment. The UGT emphasized that the government approved the annual standard plan of 2025 in April, in which the “guarantees against the removal of the workers against the removal, in line with the European Social Charter, strengthen the cause of the extinction cases of the labor relationship”. But, at the same time, keep in mind that it has already had this change in the control plan of 2024, and this answer is considered “weak”.

“The PAN 2025 reference is very obscure and in the guarantees to follow the letter, the reform of compensation or the restoration of processing wages, the most likely to read the victim of unfair removal,” the UGT protest. The union indicates that the “concrete measures to adopt an inaccurate process” to correct the “dismissal process” by the CEDS by both the Spanish executive or legislative authority.

In view of this Panorama, the letter stated to the European Council “European Social Charter’s Article 24 needs to be effectively consenting (which recognizes the right to workers who are dismissed for adequate compensation or other appropriate compensation), and immediately by implementing its responsibilities”.

If this is to be true, the union asks that they should be included in the compensation for unjust or allowed removal, along with other actions, processing wages. This is the way the worker has to repay the financial risks experienced between the deleted date and the appeal body decision. In addition, the UGT is also required to read the person’s reading, and also requires a large amount of sufficient amount of damage to the victim and the loss of the victim. ”

He is Removal system in SpainIt will establish a maximum of 33 days salary per year, which has worked with 24 monthly payments, when the employment relationship is long, but at the same time produces a small remedy as a child.

Parliamentary fragility

This UGT claim will be reinforced by another resolution of CEDs, in this case A cc oo claimThe European Agency dictates for unfair removal against the Spanish regulations, although it has not yet been published. The Ministry of Labor said after the first resolution called social agents To fix the versionBut he did not yet. Months later, he said Answer to CC OO To take into account two resolutions.

With the current balance of congressional forces, it is difficult for imagine to overcome the reform of these qualities. The structures on the right side are obvious against changing compensation for the removal. Various sources of social conversations have pointed out that there are less chances for fruit rather than reducing working hours to this change.

There is no consensus in the government The economy against Despite the statements of the Council of Europe, to begin this discussion, in accordance with the owner’s policy. The Supreme Court has strengthened this position In December last yearBy going to the extra compensation granted by some courts. However, he admitted that he did not take into account the verification of the European social charter in 2021, which expressed a new statement that completes the fixing theory.