The Constitutional Court approves the central nucleus of the Amnesty Act | Spain

Amnesty law It is completely constitutional with the exception of a few minor details, in the next few days, in the next few days, the appeal submitted by the PP on June 24 is to resolve on June 24. The text of the presentation is described under the direction of the Vice President of the Court of State, Immaculate Motelbon, according to legal categories, the constitutionalism of the central nucleus of the norm and at the same time, Partially assess the resource On September 9, their leader, Alberto Neez Fijo, presented 270 aides and senators of the leading party. The sentence proposal refers to three reasons for unconstitutional contradictory and rejects the rest of the PP appeals.

On the one hand, in relation to the scope of the law, Article 1, “November 9, 2014 and October 1, 2017, the actions of the criminal, administrative or accounting responsibility in the consultation framework in Catalonia, its manufacturing and its consequences” will be loaned. And in those actions, “the division or independence of Catalonia, as well as the achievement of such interests,” and “the actions that take place during police actions,” it is difficult to determine this article.

The behavior of people who performed against the independence process of the sentence show appears in the standard of standard without thinking in debt waiver cases. The ruling proposal is expected to affect the equal judgment of the Amnesty Act, which causes the border exemption by the border exemption, which forces this Umption Han.

The appeal of the PP’s constitutional “is denied to create an area of ​​criminal immunity that is applicable to some people, but the generalization of citizenship is subject to the criminal type of criminal code classified in the criminal code.” “The principle of criminal legalization,” requires general criminal laws, whose real estimates and legal consequences are applied evenly. “

With regard to the temporary range of the application, the actions between November 1, 2011 and November 13 and 2023 are also understood and are also understood to be implemented after that date. “According to the Amnesty Act, the sentence exhibition, the perfect and point of view of the past must be limited to the facts of the past, but it is unconstitutional because of the future of the future. The sentence cancel the instruction for loan waiver acts After November 13, 2023.

Article 13.2 of the Act establishes “Archive of the Actions of the Auditors Court, the Ministry of Finance and the weakness of public influences, and in front of public sector agencies that are not opposed to the weakness of public influences.” The Constitutional Court, according to the sentence demonstration, has to be given an inquiry before all parties, and they also impose an explanation for the popular allegations of accounting policies.

The sentence proposal rebates the claims of PP, The Amnesty law justifies the fit in the Constitution And as long as the freedom of the legislator does not violate the fundamental rights. In addition, it rejects that the law is arbitrary, although it accepts that it is an extraordinary rule because it cancel the criminal consequences of the courts judgment and convicted facts.

In its appeal, the PP has denied that President Pedro Sanchez is the only goal of achieving the seven pledges needed to manage its investments. The Constitutional Court suggests that the Constitutional Court cannot investigate the OT portrayal or political strategies because they should declare an external issues, and the statement and content of the constitutional judgment norm, and where the appropriate purpose, and a legislator.

The demonstration of the Amnesty law points out the intention of calming and facilitating the political conflict. The editors of the norm reflect this: “Ten years after the beginning of the independence process, the most accused of crisis touched the stage that the most accused moments were already overcome and to overcome the tensions prescribed for the future and to remove some of the prescribed tensions and remove some.” This statement justifies the presentation of the presentation that the law is not arbitrary, but to follow the reasonable purpose.

The law of Amnesty is “a unique criminal rule and, therefore, the Constitution is forbidden, the division of powers, the storage of the jurisdiction and the protection of the jurisdiction of power”.

The sentence document is 10 in the plenary (four of the PPS’s proposal, and the remaining six of the PSOE’s proposal) will be voted with two absentee. On the one hand, the progressive Juan Carlos Campo decided to stop participating in the discussion, because the Minister (2020-2021) signed the independent proposal with the “Express and general assessment of the constitution of the Amnesty Act”. On the other hand, after agreeing to the challenge of the prosecutor’s office (four votes by six votes) (four votes), the Constitutional Court of the Constitutional Court Conservative Magistrate’s Department of Conservative Magistrate Jose Maria Makas was forced. The alleged reason is that Makas has approved the traditional member of the General Council of the Judiciary, the Senate’s view on the Amnesty law The process It is unconstitutional. The document reached the Senate, where the PP used it as a technical support of the veto proposal that passed the upper house on May 14, 2024. These facts, according to the Constitution, have caused Macass’s “objective loss of impartiality.”

Returning to Puigdemont Spain

Amnesty law does not allow the HASSA guarantee of the Constitutional Court at the moment, Returning to Carles Puigdemont Spain. The Supreme Court has commented that the debt of public funding will not affect the president of the former Cat also. The court of judgment The process Independence understood that Puegdemant riched PueGDMant for patriarchal. The Cott also fled from justice, who has fled from justice, has constitutionally appealed to the supreme commentary made by the Supreme Court of Amnesty, but it takes several months to pronounce the challenge. Against the Amnesty law you have to address another 20 resources: 14 communities (13 PP is ruled by the Most Castilla-La Mancha, where the PSOE governs); The constitutional matter of the Supreme, the Superior Court of Justice of Catalonia and the provincial court of Madrid.