Supreme United States Prevents the boycott of Trump immigrants with the war law of 1798 | International

The United States Supreme Court has ordered the Donald Trump government that there is no sport in the Texas Bluebonet Detention Center at least thirty Venezuela immigrants. Officials have planned to transfer them to El Salvador using the 1798 law of the Foreign Enemies Act and the War of War to put them in the Naib Bookel’s high security prison. With his decision, published this morning at dawn, The waiting period begins until the lower court, the fifth circuit or the Judicial District of the United States.

“According to the Foreign Enemies Act, an application has been filed before the court on behalf of a group of prisoners who request the court orders against them to be expelled. The matter is currently pending before the fifth circuit. After the fifth circuit is pronounced, the Attorney General will not be sent to the court immediately after this court. Supreme decision.

The court’s resolution suggests that the judges of the most traditional ideology voted against Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. Alito publishes a certain vote explaining the reasons for his disagreement. The other seven magistrates, four conservatives and three supported the progressive decision.

On Friday, two Federal Judges refused to intervene when immigrants launched a desperate legal campaign to prevent the expulsion. The Appeals Court of the fifth circuit of the United States has not yet pronounced this in this regard. One of the judges said the case had raised legal concerns, but he could not govern the matter Supreme recent Commands against deportation can only come from those who have the jurisdiction of immigrants.

Trump is using the law passed for the time of war to expel immigrants by fast track. He alleged that he belonged to the armed groups, but without proving in the law of law or without giving guarantees to prisoners. Salvadoron’s administration, who was legal in the United States, was a mistake, but instead of trying to return it, he dedicated himself to rejecting him.

The Foreign Enemies Act has been launched only three times in the history of the United States, recently in the Second World War to hire Japanese-American citizens in detention fields. The Trump administration argues that it has given them power to quickly expel immigrants to identify the band members, regardless of their immigration status.

In a recent decision, Trump, which was divided into a Supreme Court, allowed five votes and four votes against four, to continue using the law, but without judgment on the fund. That suggests that resolution Migrants should challenge their expulsion before being expelled from the country And they must have a “reasonable time” to go to court.

Despite the majority’s resolution “all the rhetoric of” disagreements “, their judgment confirms that their judgment has the right to inform the subjects that are forced to be detained under the Foreign Enemies Act and the possibility of challenging their deportation.”

In your special vote, Four are supreme judges They have argued that they have been given the law that has only been deported to stop and expel foreign citizens from the “country or enemy government” from the “country or enemy government” with that country, or when the “foreign country” threatened with “invasion or exploitation infiltration” against the United States territory.

“To date, the United States Presidents have only triggered the Foreign Enemies Act only three times, in the event of an ongoing war: there is no ongoing war between the United States and Venezuela, along the 1812 war, World War and World War.

The magistrates have warned about the authority drift, without guarantees a law, skipping the literature of the norm, and with a government, after being expelled, after being expelled, they can no longer return to the country. “The consequence of the government position is that not only the non -citizens but also the US citizens can be taken from the streets, forced to board and expelled the legal review before being expelled, if not illegal for these regime, if these governance is not illegal.