Popular action | News from Catalonia
Cat also said that the Political Manager, conflicts with a punishment, said that Spanish justice is Guantanamo of European justice. It should be noted that this extreme and popular hyperbol has been loaded with slander and distrust. This is not new. This distrust has determined the implementation of our first popular action Constitution, in 1812, Therefore, any citizen can maintain a bribe, bribe and prevalence of bribery, bribery and prevalence, and has lost him about the monopoly monopoly since then.
The constitution of 1869, fruit 1868 Revolution He removed the Isabel II of Bourbon and continued the popular act to maintain any crime in exercising his position. Thus he was distrusted with the satisfying corporateism of prosecutors and courts in the wake of the crimes made by his colleagues.
The Criminal Procedure Law In 1882, inspiring from the liberal ideas of the 1868 revolution, he introduced a popular act in general legitimacy. It can be read in their nomadic: “Spain nationals, (…) have created false ideas about the judicial policy, (…) judges, judges, notaries, and sheriffs are unfortunately suspicious.” It feels like it was written this morning.
The popular act of 1882, the true Hispanic organization, which means a basic innovation: it can be used not only against judges who suspect crimes in the exercise of their position, but also against any crime. It is established as a controller full of public service. All activities of the judges and prosecutors have created distrust and are eligible for that control. Thus he has been in our laws since then and reflects in the current Constitution.
It is admirable to allow the participation of altruistic direct citizens in the administration of justice, but is intercepted, which is a “most unusual and silly arguments of criminalizing our political system” in the process of retirement, as recently lamented, Supreme Court. He did not quoted anyone, but clearly he mentioned the abuse chattagist instrument of popular action Sterile hands, Christian lawyers, And similar, disqualified benefits, but shameful economic, political or media.
This regret Chantagist instrumental, it is useless to limit and conditioning popular actions up to its zibarisation, or trying to deal with the honest repentance of the court. His legal science is becoming suspicious of popular actions, who are complaining and complaints. Sometimes, he opened the door to those extraordinary criminals, and then he regrets. Last, Attorney General.
The Chantagista instrument of the Supreme Court’s popular action is apathetic to the expatriarchy evidence, in their suspicions. About the beginning of the 1882 Act, “Already lost or at least unarmed” seems to like to drag the prosecutor to the bench, when he criticized the ancestral legal system. The problem of popular action is that in this process, who is harmically burst, but who opens the doors.
