Left parties in Congress constitutionally resort to the change of the Mazan of the law to protect the Valencia garden | News from Valencian society
PSOE, ROMES, SUMAR, Podemos and ERC have resorted to the Constitutional Court The change of the law of Valencia Garden, Carried by Generaltat, presided over Carlos Mazan, PP, With Vox support. About 50 assistants submitted an appeal this Thursday against the decree approved by February last February, because the agricultural space around the city of Valencia was insecure and that they had urged precautionary measures to prevent irreparable damage or soil recipes.
Political representatives met at the Congress Lions door in Madrid Family photo Promoting the decision they adopted as they argue that the amendment of the previous autonomous left government is contrary to the constitutional rights of environmental protection.
PSPV-PSO’s territorial plan and sustainable development secretary, Maria Jose Salvador, and Alicante Deputy, Alejandro Solar, PP Dana, “an excuse to make the garden and people and people unprecedented, and reduce their safety.”
Salvador said that Kansel de Mazan was modified by decree by the law of the arcard based on “lies”, and criticized the “serious irresponsibility of the PP and Vox when supporting these actions” “in the case of urbanism”, which is supposed to be “Eyrotes”.
Soler pointed out that PP Dana was “to do business on a terrible tragedy and to facilitate construction in the Valencian society as an excuse and insisted that” PP is returning to wild urbanism with an interest in wild urbanism. “
The deputy of the compromise, the Esquera Republican is also supported to resort to this decree law, it will try to demolish all the protection of the “Valencia Garden” and can do 3,800 hectares of gardeners and “all the urban ulation halls like” all the urban ulation halls of the Dana on October 29th. Its capacity is clear as the key to the key to the key, causing 228 people to die.
Podemos is committed to the appeal, because, according to Podem’s autonomous coordinator Maria Teresa Perez, this version is an antidemocratic attack that “removes the voice of Kansel de L Horta to silence the voice of agricultural unions and makes the voice of the land of the territory” and the land. “
In addition, the coordinating agency between the municipalities and the Generalitat, the coordinator, is eliminated by “recent capabilities and local partnerships”, “left -wing political representatives argue. Decree is” attack on cultural heritage “, which is recognized by RTA (Art 46 CE).
Finally, the appealers think that the principle of legal certainty is violated when the control changes are introduced with structural effects, “without clarity, ability is not a parliamentary debate, because it is not only an important legal system applicable to the Valencia garden, but it is suddenly, absurd and guaranteed.”
The Orchard’s Act came into force in 2018, the Botanic (the previous left government, which was formed by the previous leftist government in 2019, was formed by the PSOE-PPV and compromise in 2019), with the object Store 11,000 hectares Declining garden for urban plans and infrastructure progress. The law has created a governing body and directed many measures to promote restoration of abandoned or degraded agricultural lands, the PP failed them.
With the devastating Dana – although the floods have been announced long before the floods – one -third of protected soils, especially in Grade 3, opened the possibility of residential structures and its ruling organ called “absurd”. Generalitat emphasizes that the law of garden in the Pio Valley, which is the main cause of Dana’s deaths, has stopped the actions of the garden, the intensity of the defenders of the regulations.
Laura Chuli’s attached representative in the Valencian courts, the 2018 law of the Botanic Government is “excellent failure” because it does not meet noticeable goals and has no opinion about municipalities. He also denies that the garden is trying to be insecure: “Grade 1 and 2 will continue to be annual.
