When I wanted to summarize the theme of her new book with Sandra Mirette, Ladies, Villains and Lolitas. We look feminist about the movie we grew up (Brugera, 2025), the author reflects a moment and recognizes that it is very difficult to find a single message. It is not strange because the book has a very wide field.
Its departments focus on one aspect of a film relationship with women: from the treatment given in fiction, the process of influencing awards, from abuse Set Filming, the importance of women behind the cameras, through the construction of female characters or the way of wrapping the body of actresses. Trying to satisfy my question, the author Radical Feminist activist Carol Hanish resorts to the popular phrase “The Personal Is Political” and adds: “And the film is also.”
Ladies, villains and lolitas This is the first article Sandra Miret. There, Miret analyzes, with a complex and close form, with audiovisual and cultural subjects, recommended movies and books according to her feminist glance.
The book recognizes another step in his information profession and is the extension of the final master work than in the year 2022. He is always very wonderful, because he is always very wonderful, “When it comes to a faithful companion and criminal and rape culture,” how easy it is to limit the film to just entertainment. “
We see what we see
Sandra’s book starts with an overview of the audio fleet situation, with many of us and we are in our childhood and adolescents. Most of us are in trouble and running to protect them and protect them, with stories, shortage of gender characters is very limited and very clear, they are definitely generalized the masculine appearance (along with white and heterosexual).
How to remember the very white, thin and beautiful storytellers of the series Hannah Montana Oh Waverly Place magical. The subject, according to Mirette, did not improve when we grew up and began to watch movies made for adults.
In the series Sex in New YorkWere, and,, and,, and,, and,.. BUITCHEDWere, and,, and,, and,, and,.. Friends Oh Desperate womenAnd the sexual violence against hundreds of women is normalized and the body of which is completely unnecessary to the plot is hypersex. To overcome it, the film’s “feminine” of the qualified era is dumb and romantican and it worked on the economic level, but the gender stereotypes did nothing more than permanent.
According to the author, according to the author, not only the importance of the characters or the importance of their actions, but also the woman’s dead body. Girls (breasts, fruits, rear) are carefully selected for “cutting” flights, focusing on men’s sexual preferences, resorting to film “tricks” such as Slow Chamber to increase the happiness of the male form.
Today, they are almost visual jokes, but they have been ubiquitous in the past. There are hundreds of examples, but the woman’s classic planes should not be remembered by separating her hair from her face or from the sea, tired, for example, James Bond Saga.
However, the author points out how these mechanisms are still being used today and set the role of Cassi (played by Sydney Sweany) HappinessResorting to the same sexist models in the film for decades.
However, the author has admitted that there have been some important progresses in recent years. As an example, he sees how women and sex have been treated in the first seasons Thrones of Game .
Female architypes and defamatory absentee
“It is very surprising to realize the racist and genophobic I grew up,” the author said. “Clearly, it is mostly white cinema and the existence of people who are mostly white, very limited, and are frequented with stereotypes, and often dedicated to reviewing all the movies and ranges of your childhood, especially when you think that you have gained many people.”
Traditionally, Mirette has definitely devoted the second part of his book to break a large amount of unfavorable architects and arguments for women who have traditionally used in cinema and television. When she is more investigating and finally, she has decided to focus on her childhood and adolescents.
We have already hired in the most prominent, The Lady in trouble, trapped in the tower of the princess, to protect the gentleman with a wise shield and all her updated versions King Kong A. Star WarsGoing Shrek Oh Batman. The list is endless.
But Mirette points out many other architypes Manic Pixie Dream Girl. Almost famous Holy of Breakfast with diamonds.
Another, today is a very problematic, lolita, incredible sexual attractive girl, and unknowingly or unknowingly manipulator. But there are so many more: bad Institute, the A life -threatening womanThe warrior, the Business woman Bad trouble, single and very tall, etc.
The author also does not forget about the racial personality of the racist, the racist, the young or the young or the young bodies of the LGBTUCU, which is women, but they are still not attended from the movies and television series, or even by Heteropatriathal Prism.
Times are changing
Despite the criticism, Mirette, in the last part of the book, has recognized that the situation has gradually improved over time. As in the case of, pulling the feet Thrones of Game And as we suggest, even adding many setbacks Happiness.
With a simple examination of cinematographic or series, it is not difficult to see. There are more directors that provide their own form Male’s gaze.
In short, those things have changed a lot, but we are not yet at the end of this route. Occasionally, very successful projects also appear Elite Oh Emily in ParisIt seems to have been taken from another era regarding their treatment against women.
Certainly, thanks to the spread of Sandra Mirette, and the dedication or less of other millions of anonymous women, we have been looking at the architects and the past asforce, despite the forces of seeing new articles in the opposite direction and the new articles of girls who have been pulled over many years, and the past aspiration, but they are not fully aware of them.
When she asks what she wants readers and readers of her book, Miret is creating her goal “I want to sow doubts and critical ideas, so that people know how important its imagination and use, they will see what they see and what they see.”
“The most known thing with this book is that people who read it know how important people are, and people, especially people, are all,” he said. “And I am saying ‘especially to us’ because the film has long been an industry and male sector, and most of it is the same place for film criticism. Women have taken a lot of entertainment.
