Sandra Sabatis was pronounced in “Al -Wasita” in the sentence to Danny Alves: “Transferring a dangerous message”
Sandra Sabatis Tuesday approached the table table Intermediate to Thinking Danny Alves By tsjc In his case of sexual assault, which Maria Jesus Montero made statements during the weekend.
“Policy distorts real controversy in the case of sexual violence. In the Alves case, there were two contradictory sentences at different points. “
He explained Saturday that in one of the hearing in BarcelonaConsider the guilt of the football playerBut in the Supreme Court of Justice in Catalonia, not because he considers it innocent, but because he believes that his guilt cannot be proven. “
I also confirm thisMBOS did not coincide with the victim’s certificateThe journalist said: “The first thing that is considered coherent and continuous, but the second said it is unreliable.”
Here lies the decisive difference between the two, the way to understand approval. For the judges of the Supreme Court of Justice in Catalonia, the victim’s videos are dancing before the aggression They give little reliability for their testimonyRemember.
“However, we must remember that Approval is not subject to changeThis can be found for dance, touch and even going to the bathroom together. “
Sabati continued to say, “But this could change or return at any time, which was taken into account in the first sentences, so for many jurists, The second sentence is a step back“.
This means returning to a previous framework in which the victims are difficult Try sexual assaults that occur in the intimate relationshipSabatis said.
After all this, the program Wyoming Commentary that this sentence “Transferring a painful and dangerous message to the rest of the victims of sexual assault.”.
“If there is a victim like this, who condemned his aggression within a few minutes, and who told different witnesses, those responsible for the building, Music Discodra, and even undergoing a medical study in the same morning … If you are not able to question the assumption of innocence, then who will do so?question.
“The message that moves the second sentence is that Victims of sexual assaults They said they would believe only if they had a typical situation and behavior before and after the aggression. “
The presenter concluded by saying that “every sentence that ignores and reduces gender violence is a decrease in building a more just and equal society. In the face of inequality, not a step back“.
