The person was not able to work as it came here in advance … Interview rejection early arrival virus story TSTSD

The control of time is often seen as an asset. Especially when you have a interview with work. However, a person turned upside down. He reached the interview 25 minutes before the time, so he was not hired. This revealed the matter, and the person who took the interview did it in his social media post.

A virus post in LinkedIn led to online debate. One of these candidates was not hired only because of the interview 25 minutes ago. The boss has revealed such a post on this center. However, this post did not reveal the identity of the person who came to the interview.

A contractor’s center virus is released
When sharing his experience in LinkedIn, Atlanta -based cleaning service contractor Matthew Frevation said that the office of the office administrator requires a qualified candidate. So he decided to interview a person for this job. The candidate came 25 minutes before the planned time – he cited an important reason that he should not hire.

​

The interviewer said the person would not give this reason a job
Prevett wrote in his post – last week, a candidate came to the interview 25 minutes ago. This is the main reason I did not put him in work. After all, why did I not give him a job after doing so? It is appropriate to reach the interview a long time ago and give your opinion on it.

The most quick sign of bad time management
As the posts became popular, the premature cause further clarified and said that it is usually appropriate to achieve a little advance, but the time before time, the coming of time indicates the lack of bad time management or social awareness. He said it was better to reach out at the beginning, but it may indicate that a person is not working properly or is expected to use time.

​

Brewett wrote – when he reached the interview very quickly, I felt as soon as possible. He added that he was embarrassed by reaching his small office, because the candidate could hear my professional calls. Under the interview, Prevett stressed that the candidates are usually allowed to come five to fifteen minutes ago, but it may be considered negligent.

People protect the person who gave the interview
The post immediately went viral, which distributed people’s opinion on social media. Some supported the prevention, while some supported the candidate. A user may have written, he doesn’t have his car to go. He has come from public transport, in which he cannot control. In such a situation, he reached a little more quickly to achieve the right time. People have provided many similar reactions.