Why does the brain act differently in both humor and humor? .

Maharashtra Deputy C.M. Comedian Kunal Kamara’s troubles are on the rise, surrounded by controversy against the pagodi song against Eknath Shinde. The comedian has been sent to the comedian for hearing the case. Even before that, many comedians surrounded the freedom of the alleged manifestations. But if people laugh with jokes, what is a joke or satire, which makes people angry to this extent.

There were many studies to feel bad in mocking psychology. He says that fun is a matter of social threat and facial theory. This theory states that every person, even if he is a child, wants to save the face of the people. In such a situation, when the leaders or the well -known people become the center of humor, it seems that they are socially reputation.

In politics, when a leader is mocking, his supporters can get this personal attack. This is the reason why Shiv Sena workers were angry at Kamra’s comments. It is also known as social identity theory.

Different parts of the brain act as humor or humorous. Both are working as a Catalist for emotions, but in different ways. Brefrontal Cortex is active during humorous or humor. It is the center of creative thinking and humor. According to a study published in The Journal of Neuro Science, the Brefrontal Cortex is very active and their humor is good. When someone does or listens to a good joke, dopamine is released, which makes it happy.

Mikala of the brain is active in jokes or ridiculous. A part of the brain that controls the feeling of danger, fear and anger. When a person feels humiliated when making fun of, Amitala begins to work immediately. This also happens when the person is in danger. That is, the brain gives the same reaction to ridicule and danger.

At this time the hypothalamus becomes active, especially when the person takes the humor very seriously. It triggers the fight or plane. It makes the person quiet, or gets rich when fighting.

Comedy can create such a sharp response many times, which can cause war, violence or political upheaval. Charlie Hebdo was known for satirizing religious and political issues with French satire magazine. In 2015, the terrorist attack took place in the press office, which lost more than 10 lives. During the Iran-Iraq war in the eighties, the two countries began to mock each other, even satisfied plans. After this, the tension between the two began to increase. Later, it was forbidden to interfere with others.

After the Charlie Hebdo case, there was a debate on how to draw a line between freedom of expression and religious or personal thinking. One section believes that there should be no limit to satire and jokes, and the other began to talk about control over it. There are many countries that have rules and terms to control mocking.

– Germany has freedom to have fun, but some things are forbidden. Like leaders around other countries. In 2016, a German comedian John Bomman wrote a poem that mocked Turkish President Erdogan. Turkey was angry about this, and Germany had to take action on its own citizen.

In Russia, especially politicians, especially Putin, can not be satirical or humor. The anti -government satire is kept in the fake news section. Even the sharing of MIMEs on social media can be punished if leaders are on leaders.

– Independent speech in the United States was a great thing. A show goes there- Saturday night live. In this, every week the leaders have a hard fun. During the first time of Donald Trump, the show sat down at him, but Trump could not take any action.