STF discusses a warning in Congress and lights

The Federal Supreme Court (STF) promotes a public inquiry to discuss the solemn and parliamentary amendments. Depending on any decisions that affect the solemn amendments, there may be a mandatory payment and a new clash with the National Congress.

A public inquiry is scheduled for a month – June 27. Court Minister Flevio Dino is responsible for the decision that the intention is to collect technical aspects to confirm the measures.

The executive through the mechanism has been powered by the Congress over the past decade. At the same time, the aides argue that the Houses improve transparency and that amendments represent independence from Parliament.

In order, Flevio raised complex aspects to impose dino amendments, which have already been questioned in the actions of the Supreme:

• The responsibility is to pay these amendments to separate the three powers and the presidential system;
• Considering the results in tasks and services, the ability, economy and amendment plan;
• The compatibility of the whole and the increase in amendments to the Constitution;
• And if amendments follow the rules of financial responsibility.

“The insults of misconduct, the insults of misconduct, the deviations from public resources, or similar factors, because such situations are resolved in police inquiries and criminal acts in police inquiries and criminal acts in the Supreme Court.

However, if this year’s budgets and subsequent ones need it, no ban has already been completed. In the House, the leader of the Union Brazil, Deputy Pedro Lucas Fernandez (MA) and House President Hugo Mota (Republican-PB), argued that “signs of transparency and powers.”

“Parliamentary amendments mean the independence of this parliament. The responsibility of these amendments is to strengthen us here. I see that Minister Flavio Dino discussed and this is the progress of Parliament regarding the community,” parliament said.

In another part, the Dino did not leave the Federal government about the lack of transparency of parliamentary amendments. The Magistrate’s management and inventions were given five days to explain the limit of access to the documents of the executive signed contracts and contracts, especially with amendments.

Acceptance is no longer possible, for example, the accountability of the municipalities who received the money from the so -called Budget, which is considered the Supreme Court properly. Transparency follows this decision with the request of Brazil, international transparency and open accounts. He said the folder would make documents available again.

The Supreme Court has been charged with the Ministry of Tourism about the implementation of the Pix Amendments and concluded that the government will expand the ongoing audit to include more NGOs involved in abducting money from parliamentary amendments.

The governors have stated that the executive should do his best. But they argue that there should be no extensive criminalization with the ability to damage public policies.

“The Congress or the government should not do it without the main goal, it is to obtain growing transparency. Making any land abuse, must be analyzed, investigated and responsible for any land,” said Miss Maria Do Rosario (PT-RS).