Feijo insists that the debt is “unconstitutional” despite the constitutional exhibition | Spain

PP leader, Alberto Neez Peezo, ignored the demonstration of the known Constitutional Court on Sunday night, which supports the constitutional core of the Loan waiver Act. Despite the thesis of the Guarantee Court, the maximum anchor of the Constitution, is still pending in a judgment, and Fijo emphasizes the constitutionalism of Catalan’s freedom. “Today they are hoping to convince us that it is legitimate to buy the government with rights,” said the PP leader Koseres in an act. “I say no. It is not moral, not moral, it is not legal. It is unconstitutional because all the professionals of this country are lawyers of the Senate, the lawyers of the Congress, the General Council of the Judiciary, the most prestigious constitutionalists … Amnesty is the Constitution of Amnesty.
Earlier, the popular national representative, Borja Semper, defended the “Constitutional Court, regardless of the provisions of the Debt Act, which would not change anything, it would not change anything, constitutional judgment.” Although the PP has approved the constitutional core of the Core expressed in half a dozen cases, the popularity of the loan is “political pay and vulgar”. “This is still our position. It is a constitutional or unconstitutional, which is political corruption,” said a prominent representative.
The PP General Secretary, Kuka Darra, is one of the “many reasons” in the draft of the sentence, and the Spanish nationals have to focus on government president Pedro Sanchez, this Sunday at Plaza de Espana in Madrid.
Amnesty insisted that “The Instrument” was insisted on that, with Sanchez bought his investment and opened this legislature. “Now, nearly two years later,” some of the government is dedicated to “chasing criminals”, he denies that the “Dirty War” led by Leer Duze, collected by PSOE’s militant service, was mentioned.
“This is Shanchismo, so there are many reasons at 11 am next Sunday, which we need to end and that we are eligible for the good government and another way to direct the Spain,” he said. However, because the second number of the PP does not give judgment at the bottom of the draft, it is “logical”, so it does not have access to it.