European justice declares that gender gap is a filling of pensions despite the reform | The economy

The European Justice has once again reviewed whether the gender gap contributing to the contributory pensions and that it is discriminatory due to sex. The Court of Justice of the European Union (TZU) has issued a punishment this Thursday, in which the current regular writing of this plus has not ended the fact that men in comparable conditions to comparable to women.

The TJUE responded to the two basic judgments that the two Spanish courts raised, which asked whether it was in favor of the European command in relation to the progressive application of the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the matters of current drafting social security of Article 60’s Article 60’s Article 60. The PP government has created this maternity affiliation to the mothers of two or more children between 5% and 15% European Justice canceled it in December 2019 with discrimination due to sex At the head of the Ministry of Social Security with the executive of Pedro Sanchez, Jose Louis Essrieve, he had to be re -designed, so that the parents could receive it from it and the first child.

With the amendment to implement it on February 4, 2021, the fill is called “Tax Pensions to reduce the gap gap” and tries to repair the damage faced by women in their professional career to take a major role in child care work. By 2025, the affiliation was set at 35.90 euros per month for each child.

Spanish courts, From the first example to the supreme, they spoke on several occasions The first complement designed for the parents and the discrimination of the administration to recognize the right to gather the right of men. When he pointed it in 2023 Male parents set out double. Therefore, the court of Luxembourg has approved compensation to compensate for judicial costs.

Requirements for parents

Now, the European Justice has analyzed the current writing of Article 60 of LGSS and has not accepted its integrity. Maximum European Judicial example repairs the fact that the work is automatically granted to the mothers Parents must meet some additional requirements so that it can perceive it, Their professional careers were interrupted or influenced by their children’s birth or adoption, or a widow pension for the death of sons or other parents of daughters, some of them have the right to absorb an orphaned pension.

“This discrimination cannot be justified on the basis of the exemptions planned to protect women due to their motherhood to compensate for their motherhood to replace the time spent for children’s education or the disclosure of women, and to help them in their career and guarantee full equality between men and women in professional life,” the court said. The gender gap compliment has been exposed to its concession and the pleasure of maternity leave, or the disruption of her activities during the birth of the birth of a woman, and that a woman has no contact between the disadvantages of her career.

Supplement oppression

A review of the gap compliment race by the Superior Court of Justice of Madrid (TSJM) has reached Luxemburg, which is not enough to impose justification needs for parents and therefore rule discrimination and and Pomplona’s Social Number 3 Court, which is also suspected to be the root of the mother Granted to the father to resolve discrimination based on sex, he initially refused.

On this second issue, the TJUE indicates that the European command in connection with the progressive application of the principle of equal treatment between men and women in social security does not oppose the filling of one of the two parents and absorbs a lower amount of retirement pension. In this sense, the verdict issued on Thursday, if the father was initially rejected for being in a state of direct discrimination, indicates the removal of the pension filling already identified to the mother.

Now, the court recalls that European law does not need to lose pension compliment because it has already analyzed those who have already identified. For all these reasons, it is called to understand their provisions to understand their provisions and whether the father is able to claim the pension that is already identified to the mother when the father is able to claim a controversial pension compliment in accordance with the same requirements applicable to mothers.