Do Iran uses nuclear discussions in her favor?

In the Iranian Media Parliament, the National Security and Foreign Policy Committee member of the National Security and Foreign Policy Committee quote his back and Nand MP Abu al -Fadl, determining the “agenda” of Iran -American talks today, because the two parties have no specific positions of negotiations. “

On Saturday, ambassadors from Iran and the United States returned to the Iran nuclear event after US President Donald Trump returned to the White House in preparations for the first round of negotiations.

A private plane from Russia arrived in Amman on Saturday morning, and American Ambassador Steve Wichov met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Friday.

At the same time, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Arakzi discussed the details of the discussions with his Omani counter Badr Busi, Busi.

In a statement, Araakji confirmed that if there is insufficient will from both sides, the timetable for negotiations can be determined. He said the negotiations would be indirect and would focus on the nuclear file seeking to sign an agreement to protect the national interests.

On the other hand, Trump and Vickov stressed the talks “direct”. The first goal of the United States is “to demolish Iran’s nuclear program”, saying that their red line is “the lack of nuclear weapons of Iran”.

The Iranian media has released a temporary agreement instead of reducing US sanctions on Iran, and the proposal has repeatedly rejected the Joe Biden’s administration several times after indirect talks with the aim of restoring the nuclear deal in April 2021.

However, the basic problems are mysterious, especially in relation to the amount of subsidies ready to do Iran.

And his back is “the American side has already placed things that are not already heard, so Iran accepts negotiations on it.”

He said: “If the Master and Witfouf clearly heard the hearing of the negotiations, then the discussion can continue the existence of the Iranian towards the Iranian side of the discussion table until the main discussion begins in the next round after consultation with Tehran.

And his back is “if the American side wants to continue to raise his unscientific words, there will be no discussions.”

Iranian Political Affairs Minister Majid Takht Rwanji said, “It is a good opportunity to enter the American side if they avoid issues unrelated to the nuclear file and if they are threatened from threats and stress.”

Iran said, “Believe in conversation and agreement, and any attempt to threaten or impose energy is acceptable,” he said.

Meanwhile, Kihan’s newspaper, which is affiliated with the Iranian Leader Office, has called for a team of negotiations not to enter into any discussions until the full and effective and effective complete and effective of the sanctions are completely lifted.

“The US should know that the United States should not give the United States’s threats. The US must know that Iran cannot accept Iran to accept Iran by repeating the policy of the island. The maximum stress system does not lead to a change in Iran’s accounts, but only strengthened the country’s strategic independence.

The Ministry of Iranian Culture and Information received a warning from the newspaper to oversee the newspapers. The newspaper has severely criticized the Masoud Bouchakian government for receiving this warning.

Kihan and Khameni’s editor -in -in -in -In -In -Hussein Sarani wrote in the article “All government systems including the” Islamic Republic “in the editorial” Indirect talks and many aspects “,” Islamic Republic, no secrets, do not need to be disclosed to the country. “

Sharatamari “does not have to ask the authorities questions on cases, which can harm the system.”

He recalled Ali Khamani’s statements on talks with the United States, which he felt “unknown, not smart and unclean,” he said, “Indirect discussions in Amman will not take place without the knowledge and approval of Kheyi,” this approval “instructs the instructions and the red paths of these discussions.

Sharatamari felt that indirect talks were “shame and treb to the US”, which only targeted “testing the other party and not to withdraw the fixed positions of the Islamic Republic.”

He called for revolutionary forces to follow the three demands from the negotiations of the revolutionary forces: to emphasize Iran’s circumstances, rejecting any black mail from the US and providing perfect information to counter rumors that encouraged enemies. “

In the relevant context, a senior officer at the Iranian Guide office, Ali Khameni, and the latter denied that they did not agree to enter direct discussions.

Iranian President Masoud Bouchakian Khameni was asked to negotiate with Washington if needed by the “The New York Times” to the Iranian authorities; Because the alternative is the fall of the system.

According to the newspaper, “Iranian president Khameni has informed Khameni that the country’s management is no longer possible in view of the current crises.”

“The allegations of the New York Times are psychological operation and lying,” said Mahadi Satilli Media Affairs official at the Khameni office.