Civil society moves to protect the wolf: legal resources, collections and great exhibition | The weather and the environment
A month after killing wolves in Spain –In a hidden amendment in the food waste law-, various civil society organizations are trying to stop what is thought to be “brutal”. The platform is now created Iberian Wolf Protection FundIt has raised 17,000 euros in three days, which tries to hunt a major species and increase the spread. Meanwhile, environmental organizations are Like the ascending. In addition, a demonstration was made in June for the protection of species.
Ernesto Diaz, one of the new fund’s promoters under the protection of the Cantabriya Mountain Range: “As soon as the amendment is approved, we have approved, we have to write the project, we had to write a budget, contacted the experts and created a team in a month.”
They want to raise 200,000 euros, half of which are for legal action and the other half, education, training and local bodies. In just three days, they were committed to the project that hit 17,000 euros and 30 entities in Spain and Portugal. They have the advice of Jaime Dorreste, the lawyer who can freeze the structure of Elgarobico.
According to Diaz, “a unruly lecture alleged that the wolf is the source of all evils of the rural environment.” But it is not: “The financial loss caused by the species is small, the wolves in 2025 are not a problem in Spain. The number of models is still fragile due to its conservation status. Although we believe in official statistics, It does not make sense to kill 53 wolves in Asteruria in the population of 350 wolves. It is brutal. ”
The Association for the Conservation and Study of the Iberian Wolf (Askel) is one of the most tradition of the protection of Canid. “On Monday 21st, we certify in the Situ as the Cantabriya government is already killing the wolves. This is a complete shame. It is a complete shame. We will be all the ways to demand criminal and administrative responsibilities in which we are in line with the wolves, but it is not useful for Askel.
The company has shown lodging resources against Cantabriya, Asturias and Galicia, which already allow for the removal of samples (well with the hunting, well with guardians). “Cantabriya said their previous wolf planning was still valid, and 41 could kill wolves. They’re already doing. When they are going to be born, there are guards with pregnant women with thermal audiences with pregnant women,” Martinez said. Therefore, they are controversial against this society seeking precautionary measures. Representative of the Superior Court of Cantabriya said that the petition had been converted into precautionary measures to give the petition a precautionary measure, so there would be no decision until next week.
According to Louis Sovereage, it is like the WWF: “On the one hand, we have submitted an appeal in Cantabriya and we will do the same in Asterias and Galicia. On the other hand, we are asking the Ministry for the environmental transformation of resorts to the resort to the constitutional court, because it is not a legitimacy.”
Similarly, Theo Asks from ecologists: “We seek the PSEE and the environmental transformation to provide an unconstitutional appeal, as all the manipulations in processing food waste law.
Census of species
From the Ministry of Environmental Transformation, they point out that the expansion process of the species of species ends, once societies have reported their data, it is basic to know the evolution of species over the past six years and the current state. “The Ministry of Ministry will make appropriate decisions about a solid scientific, technical and legal basis,” said a spokesman.
And he adds: “Current regulations (Berna and EU Directive Agreement) and their legal explanation (the judgment of July obtained” must be taken into account ”.
Various organizations that work in favor of the wolf have already set up densities and protests in different places. In addition, it is already organized to set up a great state show in Madrid in June – still without a accurate date – to see the opposition of this action. The NGOs are asking the PSO to demonstrate the constitutional resource for the amendment, but the socialist circles have now rejected that opportunity.
