Riya Chakraborty Case: ‘The judicial action against the CBI must be destroyed’

Bollywood actress Riya Chakraborty (Photo- @RheachakrabortyOfficial)

The Clean Sid, a Central Intelligence Bureau (CPI), has created a strange trouble among the most told intellectuals of our country. The truth is, as usual, we raised a crowd to apologize to those who do not need to apologize. The only reason for this was Riya Chakraborty was punished by the court. So if the judiciary is not responsible, I do not understand whether people are on social media or outside, why do you get such anger against many media staff?

Media Work Report. A statement that you cannot agree, the exaggeration that goes with it does not like you, that exaggeration is painful, you may seem disgusting, but when the media reports on the Emperor of Riya, you cannot deny the fact that it really reports court proceedings. A person with both judicial license and judicial rights was sentenced to punishment.

I do not remember whether a media person was imprisoned by Riya Emperor. I refer to only Riya Chakravarti as a sign of a major disease that has affected India. We do so quickly to solve people, while we have no right to determine what their professional opinion can be. As I have said, if we do not allow the media to complain as wished, we will stay in a community, and it is isolated and is untouchable by reality.

Of course, many will say that the way the media raised the issue is probably not correct, but still, is this the fault of the media? Because if he had made a false statement or created a situation that the judge denounced it, it was his fault. Nevertheless, you must justify the judiciary. If her media is able to seduce, it can easily affect it.

I wonder how we will look behind the people without finding the reality of the facts or their work. Yes, some people and a special person apologized and said that the people of his channel should apologize. Very good, but we all must be Mahatma Gandhi to prove that we are honest and true.

In my opinion, if that person or those people do not believe in apology, I do not believe that it is important to apologize for whatever it is. Because by that argument, they must apologize for each statement.

Take a simple example. Imagine a media channel reporting a test conducted by the Enforcement Directorate on a particular person, and even after eight months or 20 months or three years, it shows that it is a witch hunt. The media didn’t report it? The media does not believe the agency’s facts or company? Are these awareness agencies suggest that the agencies should accept the consequences? There were parts of leaked information, including private chats: the media or anchors leaked? If not, why their blood thirst? Has anyone mentioned that violating the official secret or guidelines? No answer. Did someone apologize to the agencies? No answer. But, it is easy and fashionable to target the selected media, isn’t it?

How can we make logical arguments about what we have seen in the last five or six? I wonder how we allowed us to affect the discriminatory referendum, which seems to be aware and not realistic in both our attacks and our accents.

The polarization of the media in our country is not made by the media, but is done by those outside the media. Since you do not accept their opinion about the ridiculous things about the media, we have now become part of our dictionary. Although we call them a dock medium or pro -Modi or anti -media, the truth is that the work of the media must report. If you don’t agree with their statement, you don’t have to see the channel.

If you don’t see the channel, what’s the problem? It may be true that all channels are only reported to TRPs, but this is a business model. So look at the channel you think you think is to change the business model or false, but for me that the blood of the channel or the blood of the anchor of that channel is more unjust than me.

So we need to take a deep breath in our country. Let people perform our work. You cannot agree with them. You may think they are doing something wrong. This is yours. If you are sure that they have misleaded people, go to accountability organizations, whether it is a press council or an Indian court. But we cannot decide the media, and when the news was in the public domain, the messenger could not be shot. Riya Chakraborty was arrested. In a separate case, West Bengal Minister Partha Chatterjee was arrested when he found a lot of money at his home. When the media reported it, many media channels were excluded or they were Modi’s supporters and Mamta Banerjee. The media didn’t report it? Didn’t get the money? Recently, a large money was found in the house of the current judge of the Delhi High Court. Imagine that the judge was released tomorrow. The media didn’t report it? We cannot decide by looking back. Because looking back, everyone is right.

We need to see the realities of the media business. And the media business must report. The media business is to say what people look at their eyes. These are not your eyes or my eyes. If they see it with their eyes, we have only two options. One must agree with them. The second disagrees. But we cannot be juicy for their blood like Haina’s flock. This is the problem here.

(Refusal: Personal Views of the Author of the comment revealed in this article.)

Country and the world’s latest news (There is no message) Read more in Hindi, all the big messages Times now Navbarath Live TV But. Nation (India news) Updates and elections (Elections) The Times is now related to the latest news.