Brussels demands from the United States that the negotiations are “not on good faith and threats” | International
Brussels have demanded to the United States tonight that the commercial relationship between the two parties rely on “mutual respect” and “threats”. This message was launched on the commerce commissioner, Moros Sefkovic, Social Network X At the end of a long telephone conversation with their US opponents, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnic and Commerce Representative Jamison Greer. Slovak said, “We are ready to defend our interests in a clear response to the threats that President Donald Trump has launched twice: In advertising from his social network, Truth and Oval Office, he warned that 50% tariffs could be imposed on European products from June 1.
The Sefkovic message will not go out from the argument followed by the European Commission since the opening of Washington’s commercial hostility. Priority for the resolution of the negotiations: “The EU is fully committed to the agreement to benefit both parties. The Commission is ready to work with good faith.” If the PACT is not reached, the United States will already respond to somewhat applicable protective actions: “We are ready to defend our interests.” The idea, which was poured this afternoon this afternoon, was exposed to different words by French Minister Laurent St.-Martin and the Netherlands Prime Minister Dick Shoof.
But in this message Trump has a response with demand for threats: “Trade between EU and US should not match and guide by mutual respect, not for threats. We are ready to defend our interests.” The Atlantic ratio last year for the exchange of 865,000 million euros: Union products were sold for 531.6 billion and bought for 333.4 billion. However, this imbalance is replaced by a commercial business in which the United States has surplus.
From some member states, after learning of Trump’s ads, it is not time to lose the nerves and believe that it is nothing more than a negotiation strategy. In interviews with Trump’s words after the words of the US Treasury Secretary Scott, a thesis based on Scott.
Beyond threats, a little surprise causes the White House to be diagnosed, as they are well aware that the White House tenant is no longer in talks in both capitals before threatening. He is the erated in four winds of him: “Our negotiations with them (in reference to EU) go anywhere.” This attitude is very different with what is in the community capital, where it is also agreed to lose the battle of the story if a satisfactory deal is entered into, they are considered to benefit both parties. The definition does not include the United Kingdom -achieved agreement, and many members of many member states (Poland and Sweden) have already warned at the last meeting of the Council at the council’s last meeting.
Unlike Trump’s style, everything that surrounds these discussions is taken from the EU side, with discretion and very tactile. Public statements are adopted for a very measured argument This has changed very little in recent months: open to obtain an agreed exit to benefit both parties, If the deal is not you must be willing to answer. However, in the insertion of the insertion, there have been very few progresses and have not changed since the beginning of the strip and loot.
It is difficult to listen to Brussels but there is another statement: “The United States on this side of Atlantic does not know what to get.” Are you looking to raise more to finance your taxes? Do you want to recover the American industry? A few months after Trump returned to the White House, they also showed the ongoing irritation of its traditional partners to make such a new US administration. They try to follow the general parameters in these types of discussions in international relations and commercial. In front of them, they meet a government, even with conversation issues with it, not a political level, more of the technicians.
However, in recent weeks, both parties have exchanged papers. However, a clear difference on each side of the table from the European side is observed. Some, speaking for Brussels, proposed a clear discussion platform that attends American sensitive points and demands; Others are limited to make unilateral demands that impose a particular air.
However, in those demands, some resolution about Washington’s preferences can be resolved. One of them is a tax on large digital companies, called Google Rate in Spain. This is one of the great criticism of Trump since the first day and it has changed to the table of negotiations. In the EU, there are many countries with this type of tax, including Spain, France, Italy, Austria, Hungary, Portugal, Poland and Greece.
