The Prosecutor’s Office has said that the four journalists cited to inform the Attorney General’s case
The Prosecutor’s Office has a Court of Instruction 20 in Madrid by four journalists (from El Pace, The world Y. 20 minutes. Announcing the investigation To inform about Attorney General case. By April 2, the Ministry of Public Ministry felt that the Ministry of Public Ministry was “legally impossible”, to be attributed to the crime of journalists, and attributed to the spread of some of the secrets that were attributed to them, which was the same as the same as the Open Court of the Supreme Court on the Open Court of the Supreme Court. In that document, an enormous information interest, the armed organization analyzed the conversion of information found in mobile and email Madrid’s provincial chief prosecutor Pilar Rodriguez is also charged In the High Court, he was prepared after registering his office on October 30.
In his abbreviation of the doctrine and law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), the prosecutor’s office is loaded against the decision of Judge Adelida Neevs Madrano and “Journalists cannot commit to the above crime, because they need a criminal type of criminal.” Moreover, the Ministry of Public Ministry continues to call them to declare themselves as the accused in the “Inductor Condition” in this case: “(Then) proves that these journalists have filtered the report directly and effectively.”
Prosecutor Juan Ignacio Gonzalelaz said, “Four journalists are asked to mention the four reporters as” merely natural intermediaries in the communicative process “, which is not responsible for the crime of their nature of their accused.” As always, it is a situation that does not prevent them from exposing their sources to benefit from their constitutional right.
The reason for this convoluted cause began a few weeks ago. Madrid’s provincial chief prosecutor Pilar Rodriguez complained about the filter of the UCO report, but did not indicate against journalists. Then, the Supreme Court has decided to send the case to the Plaza de Castilla Courts in Madrid for investigation. Later, Adilaida Neevs decided to set their inquiries against the four reporters and investigated the Investigation of the capital number 20 of the capital number 20, and agreed to investigate them as charged on June 19.
Caused the judge’s initiative The immediate reaction of many associations and professionals This sector. “Imputing journalists to report intense press freedom,” he condemned the platform in defense free free (PDLI). The El Pace Drafting Committee says: “Four (journalists) have only adopted the responsibility of publishing honesty and relevant information about the public purpose case, making them appear from Attorney General to Madrid Community President’s couple.” The Association of Research Journalists (API) broke that “it is a serious attack on press freedom.”
The freedom of communication, as well as the professional privacy and the right of the professional privacy and sources of the journalists, is protected, especially in the Constitution, in addition to one of the fundamental rights in a democratic state. They insisted this week More than fifty journalists The specialty of legal and court information, in 27 different media, signed a letter to denounce the right to society’s right to the right of the law on the legal activities of the high transformation. “
“If journalists who have limited themselves to fulfill their constitutional duty to spread their constitutional duty to spread their constitutional duty to spread their constitutional duty to exercise their trade to exercise their trade, protected by Article 20 of the Constitution, both and their communications resources suffer from an impact (Chilling effect) The international, European and Spanish courts considered that the courts of democratic societies were very harmful to democratic societies, ”the editors were sent to the Supreme Court president and the General Council of Judiciary (CGPJ), Isabel Perelli; Madrid Jyamim’s Superior Court of Justice;
