Ayuso’s groom’s economist condemns the cooperation of 350,910 euros News from Madrid
Javier Gomez Fidalgo, a frustrated economist Isabel Diaz Ayuso couple He defended his innocence before the judge this Tuesday. Businessman Alberto Gonzalez has justified Amador’s tax statements and assures the origins of his environment that the vault is beyond him.
Fidalo today announced that he had committed 350,910 financial fraud by businessman Alberto Gonzalez Amador, but also opposed the Left to the president as an interested role in another relationship with Amador: they do not usually judge the attic and president Ayuson.
At 10.15 this Tuesday, Fidalgo entered the View Chamber of Court 19, to answer questions about his role in economic fraud, and this whole case emerged. 62, this economist appoints an office of advisers and lawyers in Leion. Fidalgo answered two hours of questions from all parties. According to him, he was never investigated for submitting the client’s financial statement.
His assignment was one of the quality stamp consultants owned by Amador, Masterman & Vitaker, with two autolies of the suspicious community tax of fraud, in 2020 and 2021. Amador appointed him to rescue him during a check headed by a tax organization between May 2022 and January 2024.
In April, the prosecutor’s office, which requested his imputation, in the name of Amador, insisted that “many allegations were already incorrectly proven.” The Treasury has concluded that Ayuso’s couple used 1.7 million euros and fictional costs to pay lower taxes 16 false invoices.
Fidalgo is the news since the case exploded due to another reason. In addition to the tax adviser, he was the manager of the real estate company, the manager of the Babia Capital SL, in July 2023, bought the attic on the Chambe floor of Amador and Ayuso. At this time the two enjoyed the attic and raised the criticism of the opposition over whether the deal was dark.
About this, Amador spoke to the judge last month: He revealed that he would rent the property for 5,000 euros. He explained that he had asked Fidalgo to buy the attic because he had no enough funds to earn the second property at the time. Opposition parties believe that the matter will not be closed until the money is taken to buy the Babia Capital Floor.
When the roots of his environment began to investigate the Hasinda Ayuso couple, Fidalgo had no friendly connection with Amador and met him in May 2022. Fidalgo argued that he had made Master & Whitekar’s statements since his office took the roles since he was created as a circle of Beauty SL in 2008 and continued after the purchase of Amador in December 2020.
Fidalgo said that the Prosecutor’s Office of “Mendaz”, Fidalgo had exchanged emails with his client and explained his assessment as an expert for the problems raised by the inspectors. Then, Amadore answered him and he designed him to forward it to the vault.
Judge during discount
Fidalgo’s statement occurred in the framework of the main part that derived the case 14 months ago. The executive of the Qiran sanitary compound has a second part of Amador’s investigation for a bribe of 500,000 euros.
After many delays, the cause of the last month has made significant progress, when Amador first announced before the judge, Maria Immaculate Iglasius. During that appointment, Amador defended his business with Quiran. After this, the special allegations of PSOE and more Madrid have requested new actions, including the executive unit of the National Police in the executive or financial research of Qiran, Fernando Camino and his wife Maria Gloria.
The PSOE and more Madrid seek that teaching will develop before a significant change in this case: a new judge is expected to accept the case in June due to the retirement of Judge Iglasius, which will leave the post in June. For the Left parties and the progress of teaching, they are worried that the new title may be turned into research.
Madrid’s 19th Magistrate’s General Council of Judiciary (CGPJ) is appointed by the Conference Competition, which resolves in accordance with the ancient standards among the judges interested in changing their destination. CGPJ roots report that dozens of courts usually enter the same call and that this type of four or five selection processes are held every year. Until the arrival of the new title, it will temporarily appoint an alternative to the UMES, which will take care of this case for weeks or months.
Do you have anything to tell you? Write to the authors fpeinado@elpais.es Y. mviejo@elpais.es
