A small covenant for Catalan | Literature
However, this may not be very good, from here we take the opportunity to do one They are tight And remember Covenant to the tongue It was first mentioned in an article in this section, described in the collective book after this idea Very in favor (EUMO), which appeared a few months ago‘Such an agreement is part of the political agenda And that parliament passed a resolution to seek it. It can be coincidence, but it cannot be ignored. But it had to be a little.
Four years after those first formulas we need to question ourselves If it is necessary from the agreement And, if you do not make any effort to patrol good wet paper, to see how things are gone. Well, it is more necessary, because we have a obsolete language policy law (in 1998, in which the economic globalization is not provided, or the possibility of creating a new migration or new law is not allowed: today it is comprehensively assessed against the Constitutional Court (in fact, the present, the present, is that only a contract can be given to the government.
However, the concept is It is a small covenant, Because we cannot see much Patxoka in political significance or budget development. A few days ago, the worst news was confirmed, which was not the only one who had no two parties and would make their ranks no longer there. In fact, it is a good way to reach an agreement that the parties that are signing the mutual distribution of the blame are only a good failure, as it distorts the unique idea of the “national deal”, which you add to the civil society. If you are not all? If any latest data on the health of the language is needed, Catalan needs more than a small parliamentary majority.
When waiting for the General Language Policy Plan 2025-2030 to be announced, we have at least one certain, adequate ambitious goal, which is not the same as 100,000, except for the growth of 600,000 speakers, which is not 100,000 annually. If you could reach Kanga all together. The way to do this is to strengthen the consortium for linguistic normalization, more courses, with all kinds of personal and improvements, and the host classrooms are also one of the weakest links of language normalization (on the other hand, the audiozal offer for children and young people). In the case of a planned budget allowance, they are two leading areas, which are less than 256 million euros.
But the damage of numbers like the server is lost with budgets, because you do not know where the cents come from, and if you don’t know where they go, you ask if they are there and whether they are 200 promised every year. We must trust some mechanism of accounting for accounting because we must first remember that we are with expanded budgets; Secondly, because of the already accepted things and in any case, in any case, and in any case, in any case (for example, implementing the actions of the National Book Plan and reading for a period of time, with nearly 9.4 million euros, which are not very good for any pack); The third is because they do not know what games they say to “decide”, what they can cost or cover; And the fourth is because we do not know whether the promised endowment growth or not (like everything we spend for justice without using the Cat also and to climb the good of 1.3 million).
Of course, there are no good benefits, and if they transform into political action we have to do another of Kanga. Cat also seems to be strengthened by the administration of justice by requesting the “amendment of the organic law of the judiciary”, thereby the language needs to work on it. The paragraph has forced us to have a smile of candlies and everything. As my mother often said, it is better to believe it than to see it.
