What if the teacher does not become a trail coordinator? (5) …
In the “future school”, the characters have changed. The mark is no longer the center of power, the class is no longer a learning place, the error is no longer a sin, but a substance. In all these changes, there was a share that requires a radical change to be alive: the role of the author.
However, what if the teacher does not change? He explains the lesson, evaluates the duty, and what if you stand on the blackboard just like the keys? What if he does not become a trail coordinator? In creating his own learning paths with the student, not as an exchange, does he design a map of his interest, and ask questions instead of answers?
Artificial Intelligence Tools in the world that breaks every corner of education, the unchanged teacher … is invisible. His voice is blurred in front of thousands of explanations that are available, and his explanations are hidden compared to the immediate analysis provided by communication techniques and mechanisms.
The teacher of the future school is not measured by the number of pages he explains, but with the depth of the questions he raises. He does not say, “This is the way,” but rather “How do you see this problem?” He does not offer the way, but rather lighting his cross, incorporates the student’s interests to the learning evidence, integrates the steps of progress and redesign the path when the failure appears or the direction changes.
However, what if he does not do so? What if he insists on explaining, experimenting and evaluating, as nothing is changed? At that time, the teacher would not be the head of education, but rather slow. The partner will not be in the experience, but the prohibition in front of it.
The truth is: If the artificial intelligence does not eliminate the role of the author … if the teacher does not insist on remaining intact. If he returns, he will become the human elements that give learning after emotion, valuable and after man. He will become the one who knows how to think. He reads the silence, eliminates fear, encourages hesitation, and makes the scatter the opportunity to find the self.
What if it doesn’t return? He will sit in a class without students, stand in front of a blackboard that no one has read, and gives lessons in a time when he no longer waits. But if he returns? The teacher will become a “coordinator of the path” in its wide sense … the child sees not a bowl, but rather a map under creation, master the art of listening to interest, and not to guide it, but reveals the road.
However, what if universities continue to graduate with “traditional teachers” instead of the coordinators of the tracks? What are the lectures that do not reflect the world of post -colored intelligence, trapped in unprecedented principles? What if the License and Education Authorization Organization continues to measure the author of the teacher and how he is coming? How much and how many questions are the contents? How many plans are the fluctuations of the child’s condition and reality?
What if decisionmakers continue to measure the success of education at the end of the year exams? If you have academic policies, you see technology as a visual tool, not the manufacturer of education change? If the Ministries of Education continue to ask: “How do we train teachers to use technology?” Instead of listening to: “How to change the philosophy of education so that the teacher becomes a guide on an endless journey?”
What if we don’t move right now? Results What if the results are taken in rooms where the student’s voice is not reached or the teacher’s concerns or the future map? There is a risk in these questions … their ignorance is the next loss.
We are in a chapter that is not jealous. Does the teacher stand up to change policies? Are you waiting for the minister’s plan, the modified curriculum and the new job explanation … until it moves? Or is he now or start to change, even if it is no longer the way? Is he afraid to hear because he moved before he asked? Or is he afraid that his students will lose because he never goes?
During the period of artificial intelligence, neutrality is not an option. The teacher advances towards his new role, or he hides behind the learning screens, and you do not see, not explained, raise, do not respond, do not encourage. Who starts first? Seeing the teacher? Or planning policies? Who pays the price when someone is late?
To switch from a traditional teacher to the trail coordinator is more required than switching tasks; This is a deep change in thinking and self. The author has to abandon the full control of the content to become the companion of the learner, the listener understands his interest, can respond to his rhythm, and designed for learning experiences that respect his differences. Not only does the results in the useful communication, plurality management, creating human relationships and creative evaluations, are not only appreciative of the learning journey. Leaving the comfort zone, dedicated to continuous growth, and courage to experiment and learn from errors, the teacher becomes a real guide, and he is a real guide who has the ability to change learning paths, leading them towards a very humanity and intelligent future.
In fact, there are real examples of schools that have succeeded in making the teacher’s role as an effective path coordinator, thus making the learning experience unique, deep and updated. In California, the concept of “High Technology High School” “Project Based Learning” is a guide guide rather than providing strict content in designing students’ programs and finding their interests. In Finland, the educational system is popular to focus on the student, because the teacher is a program for flexible educational paths to take into account the development of personal differences and critical thinking, and continues to practice the techniques of cooperative learning and continuous assessment instead of traditional choices. In addition, the “Aldskool” program in the United States has discovered an educational model based on technology and data to customize personal learning paths, where the teacher coordinates learning between the student, the parents and the digital instruments. These examples confirm that the success of the role of the teacher is not only for the changing tasks, but also to accept a new academic theory, to support the advanced infrastructure, to satisfy the student’s interest and to achieve the education of an independent educator.
When we dive into the world of future education, if we imagine how education can develop in the light of artificial intelligence, I am happy to continue this intellectual journey with you. These ideas may appear to be philosophical reflection of each other … yes, but this is the philosophy of the way that leads to every major change. Every change began with a simple question, and every intellectual revolution was born from ordinary doubts. The next article Question: “If the educational authority is reorganized, not with the voice of the end, the voice of the learner!”
