Western positions change towards the recognition of the Palestinian state … What a …
Amman-The Conference “The peaceful solution to the Palestinian problem and the implementation of the two state solutions planned in the middle of this month is an important diplomatic effort to renew the Palestinian-Israeli Peace path at the United Nations headquarters in New York.
Saudi Arabia and France’s funding for this conference emphasizes international and regional support for two state settlements in light of rejection of any normalization with the occupation state without establishing an independent Palestinian state.
A number of countries, including Canada, Italy, Egypt and Turkey, will attend the conference, reflecting the increasing international speed of the Palestinian problem.
In this context, the two largest colonial countries of the modern era, France and Britain, have the official recognition of Palestine, with other European countries, which may create a strategic change in Western positions in an activity.
This European tendency comes in the light of the growing criticism of the growing criticism of the Israeli government’s policies, especially after the EU’s decision to review the joint venture agreement against its practices in Gaza.
Although the conference is not expected to change the equation immediately, it may integrate new foundations for uniting international positions on a fair and comprehensive peace in the region.
European changes towards the Palestinian issue
Dr. Badr al -Meddy, a professor of political science at the University of German -Jordanian, stressed that they are trying to get rid of their colonial heritage by promoting and promoting justice and promoting justice to the major European countries such as France and Britain.
These changes are not only superficial changes, but rather reference to deep restructuring in the political and social structure of these countries, which are motivated by major factors, especially the state’s influence that Europe has invaded after World War II, the determination of human rights, and the wars give their basic rights.
He believes that the occupation of the occupation, through its policies, undermined Europe’s promoted policies, which lost its credibility as the defender of human values.
He said: “The actions of the Zionist company, such as preventing humanitarian aid from the Palestinians and practicing proper hunger, have led to a blunt contradiction with international standards supported by countries such as France and Britain. He is now sensitive, and he is now not sensitive, he does not realize the importance of the industry, not the position of the industry, now is not the profession, but the industrialist is not the profession.
He pointed out that at the expense of ties with Europe, the continuity of the state that occupied its own interests, especially Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s interests, increased the problem of the situation.
Zionist, according to the past, did not respect the European-Israeli federalism, which prompted Europe to reconsider its political priorities in accordance with its aspirations and its declared policies.
Social changes
And politics in Europe
The past pointed out that there was a significant change in the European social structure in favor of the Palestinian issue, which would long in the political scene, including the creation of elections and future institutions.
In an effort to expect these changes, countries, such as France and the UK, are trying to restructure European-Israeli relations, which do not distract the Palestinians to establish an independent political institution from the rights of the Palestinians.
This change reflects Europe’s desire to protect its achievements in human rights and judiciary, which considers the past “tired of the Israeli altar.”
The past emphasized that the occupation of Gaza revealed the contradictions of the European countries, which found themselves in important situations that they did not expect.
He added: “The humanitarian crisis in this field has put forward the challenge to protect Europe its credibility as a result of the policies of the occupied state.”
He pointed out that there was a change in the international and European mood on the Palestinian issue, but he emphasized the need to translate this change into clear institutional and social policies and strategies.
He said that if it is not possible to achieve the firm political decisions of the Palestinian people, any international conference that will face the humanitarian disaster in Gaza should be a priority to the Palestinian issue.
Between Western diplomacy and Israeli reactions
In addition, military and strategic expert, Nidal Abu Zaid, said that France’s Western reports relating to Palestine’s Western Street are a part of a strategy to silence the Arabic popular sites.
Abu Zaid pointed out that the polls in the West pointed out that the Arab population had a significant change in the mood of the West, which explains the media’s speed with the recognition file of Palestine.
He explained that the Western diplomatic speed is accepted by a study -made media plan aimed at restoring Western sympathy.
The project is to exploit security events to improve the “Social opposition” and “oppressive” speech, as happened in the incident of the Jewish Museum in Washington.
He pointed out that Netanyahu used such events to restructure the media account in support of the occupation state by provoking the controversy in the countries that support Palestine, which promotes the Western discourse that supports the Zionist company at the expense of recognition.
The German Foreign Minister’s media speech, one of the most important supporters of the occupied state, has seen a significant change, “After criticizing military operations in Gaza, the German speech returned to support Israeli posts after Germany’s over -events, which reflects the impact of political efforts.
Challenges to recognize the Palestinian status
Abu Zaid urged a strong international option to recognize the status of Palestine, and it seems to be present.
He pointed out that any decision could be in the debate, especially since the Zionist company to prevent these results.
He explained that the recent Israeli Nessett concluded the concept of “Judea and Samaria” is aimed at closing the door to any Western efforts to deal with the word “Palestine” as a political organization.
This decision, according to Abu Zaid, reflects an Israeli strategy to prevent the progress of any diplomatic efforts that support the establishment of the Palestinian state.
