Waqf Correction Bill 2025 Supreme Court heating first day
Investigation against Waqf Bill in Supreme Court (File Photo)
The hearing against the Waqf bill was held on Wednesday. On this day, the Supreme Court has not issued any orders, but some sharp questions must be asked by the government. At the same time, the Supreme Court said that violence against Waqf could not be accepted. On behalf of petitions filed against the Waqf bill, Kapil Sibal presented this page and described it as violating the constitution.
Questions “Waqf” from the center of the Supreme Court
Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice K.V. The bench of Viswanathan and Prosecutor General Tushar Mehta, who appeared at the center, could not allow the “user’s Waqf” because many do not have the documents needed to register such a Waqf. The “Waqf Pi user” refers to a practice recognized as a property religious or charity immigration (WAQF), even if Waqf is not issued a proper, written announcement by the owner, based on long -term, uninterrupted use of such purposes. The bench said, “How do you register Waqf? What are the documents in them? What are the documents? Yes, something is wrong. But I have read the results of the Brevi Council. Waqf Bio -Bio -Issue is recognized.
What happened in the Supreme Court today
- Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said there was a large area of Muslims who did not want to rule by Waqf law. The bench then asked Mehta, “Do you say that Muslims will allow you to be part of the Hindu settlement boards? Say it openly.”
- The Supreme Court said that if a public trust was declared Waqf 100 or 200 years ago, it could not be taken under the Waqf Board or not otherwise declared. The bench said- “You can’t rewrite the past.”
- Mehta said that before crossing the two houses of Parliament, a joint parliamentary committee held 38 meetings and examined 98.2 lakh memorant.
- CJI Khanna said the High Court could be asked to deal with petitions. “There are two features we want to listen to both sides. First, should we hand over it to the High Court? Secondly, in short, what do you really emphasize, what are the arguments?” We are not saying that the Supreme Court is staying in the Supreme Court to investigate and decide on petitions. “
- Senior lawyer Kapil Sibal, who appeared for the petitioners, cited the Waqf Amendment Act and challenged the rule that only Muslims could create Waqf. Sibal asked, “How can the government decide whether I am not a Muslim, so whether Waqf is eligible to make?” “How can the government say that only those who have followed Islam for the past five years?”
- Senior lawyer representing some petitioners, Abhishek Singhvi, said that the Waqf law would be influential across India and that petitions should not be sent to the High Court.
- Senior lawyer who opposes the Waqf law, Husheba Ahmadi, said that Waqf was the established practice of Islam by the user and could not be abolished.
The Waqf Revision Bill has been announced
On April 5, the Center recently announced the Waqf (Amendment) Act of 2025 of 2025, approved by President Drabadi Murmu. This was passed from Parliament after a heated debate in both houses. The bill was protested by 128 members and 95 in the Rajya Sabha. It was recognized by the Lok Sabha, of which 288 members supported it, and 232 opposed it.
72 petitions in opposition
About 72 petitions have been challenged by AIMIM leader Azadheen Owaisi, All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), Jamiyat Ulama-e-Hind, Dravida Mundra Gazakkam (DMK), Congress MPS Imran Pratapkarhi and Mohammed Javed. The center filed a cavity in the Supreme Court on April 8 and demanded an inquiry before the order of the case was passed. Cavitz is filed by a party in the High Courts and Supreme Court.
Country and the world’s latest news (There is no message) Read more in Hindi, all the big messages Times now Navbarath Live TV But. Nation (India news) Updates and elections (Elections) The Times is now related to the latest news.
