Views for the reconstruction of the war on Gaza …
Since the launch of the Israeli military attacks on Gaza on October 8, the clash between Israel and Hamas has increased, which has increased the humanitarian situation and the tension in the region. This growth comes in a complex environment, which includes missile attacks and unilateral air strikes by the Israeli occupation government, which raises the risk of increasing public and raises international concerns on the possibility of conflict expansion. In addition, these attacks show the strategy of Israel to deviate from the political path and in the ongoing negotiations, as it uses military force to achieve its political and security goals, undergoing international efforts to bring about peace and improve the source of conflict rather than its solution.
Current events interfere with the international community in search of diplomatic solutions to alleviate conflict. In this context, many potential views for the development of the situation reflect different challenges and opportunities to the concerned parties, and refer to the set of conditions required to achieve consistency or increase military operations.
To eliminate the military capabilities of Hamas and other armed groups, the first scene of Israel’s comprehensive air strike on Gaza can be greatly affected by the internal political advances of Israel and international positions, especially American. Recently, the eviction of the head of Shin Pet has led to firm inner tensions in Israel, which can affect the stability of the security leadership and reject the continuity of military operations and increase the internal stresses to take steps to escape the needs of the Israeli movement, and try to cover the political failure inside the Gaza. In addition, Trump’s statements insist that “create hell in Gaza” contribute to increasing public opinion and strengthening international support for a strong Israeli response, especially from the US side.
These internal and international factors increase the chance of carrying out a comprehensive attack on Gaza, as the Israeli government is a way of recovering its security skills and confidence in its image in a military response. All of this makes the first scene more opportunity to verify in the light of the impact of this political and security kinetic.
The second scene reflects the limited renewal of the conflict between Israel and Gaza, as Israel is carrying out defined target sites in Gaza. These measures may be a strategy to pay attention to the internal political crisis facing Prime Minister Netanyahu, including tensions and the risks of the government’s decay within his government alliance.
Moreover, these actions come under the testing of Netanyahu related to administrative scandal and other cases. The conditions for this situation include a series of political crises and increased pressure on Netanyahu to show strength and stability in foreign policy, which leads to limited measures to ensure re -confidence.
The chances of this situation are relatively high, and the urgent need for Netanyahu and his government to deal with internal criticism and maintain the stability of the government. These tensions can lead to military decisions in order to strengthen its political image at home and outside.
The third scene covers an international mediation aimed at reaching a long-term fight between Egyptian-Catar or Hamas and Israel. In this context, the international parties have a decisive role in facilitating talks between the two sides, which can reduce the siege imposed on Gaza in exchange for Hamas pledge to prevent military operations against Israel. Continuous and intense international pressure on the conditions for this situation must push both parties towards a political solution, in addition to Hamas’s readiness to negotiate directly or indirectly with Israel.
The chances of achieving this situation are low due to doubts about the serious challenges, including political and ideological obstacles, and their commitment to the conclusions. Access to this fight requires important privileges from both sides, and international warranty to help maintain the contract and performance of the contract.
Every situation in the conflict between Israel and Gaza is deeply affected by the complex group of regional and international factors, but the Israeli domestic policy, the diplomatic moves of the United Nations, and the major powers such as the United States and the European Union. The complex dynamics of this conflict involves the Iranian influence in the region, which plays an important role in supporting armed groups such as Houthis and Hebolla, which increases the difficulty of achieving peaceful immigration.
The political environment within Israel, especially the challenges faced by the Prime Minister in the formation of a stable government, affects foreign policy, including the approach of Gaza. On the other hand, the United Nations and the main forces are trying to provide diplomatic solutions aimed at reducing tensions, but the success of these efforts often stumbles due to field challenges and political tensions.
In this context, the possibility of any change or sudden increase in political or military leadership can lead to extreme changes in power balance and adopted strategies, it depends on the unexpected and unexpected improvements.
