European Parliament prevents new EU transparency rules
AdvertisementThe AFCO of the European Parliament (AFCO) on Wednesday rejected the plan to implement a EU creature for ethical rules, and European companies agreed after corruption allegations of Cutter and Morocco.
In the spring of 2024, eight of EU companies and consulting organizations Signed a contract To create an interim constitutional organism for ethical standards of EU organizations and members of the Advisory Committees. “
The European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Union Council, along with five other companies, agreed to create a congregation with its representatives and five independent experts, and in the responsibility of creating and renewing general minimum rules, the common practices to guarantee and control their execution.
EU companies now have to establish internal rules to implement the agreement, but the first attempt to do so has failed in the European Parliament.
The report prepared by the AFCO Commission includes the rules of regulating the appointment of independent experts or parliamentary representatives in the protocol – each company must appoint a senior member – and protects interest in the body.
The Commission was divided into votes: Socialists and Democrats, Europe’s renewal, Green/All and Left were favorable, a total of 13 votes. All right -wing (Conservatives and European reformers, patriots of Europe and Europe), such as the European famous party (PPE), voted, its choice to reach the 17 negative votes rejected.
PPE’s alliance with correct -Wing groups follows the most common standard in the voting of the new European Parliamentary Legislature, “The majority Venezuela “is the name given to the support vote to recognize Edmundo Gonzalas as the leader of Venezuela in October 2024.
Ethics in danger
Parliamentary sources told Eurnevs that the rejection of this particular plan is not the same for the withdrawal of the contract’s company in a protocol organization.
He said that the European Green/Free Alliance (Christian Democrats) and the European Democrats (Christian Democrats) wanted to hear a comment on legal service in this regard, and that a complete debate on the matter may be one of the options. Along with the Green, Socialists and Liberals, the rules of Parliament may be emphasized other than the choice of independent experts without reforming the rules of Parliament.
“The progressive side of the European Parliament has further promised this decree of honesty, transparency and responsibility, despite the BPE unacceptable to join extreme right -wing groups, so it breaks any commitment to the responsibility of the protocol element,” said Socialist Mio Lopez Acouler.
But the development of the ethical system now seems in danger, as the largest group of European Parliament is strong against a new body that affects the internal functioning of Parliament.
Mio Lournd Vinsey, a spokesman for the European Parliamentary Constitutional Council PBE Committee, said, “The” ethical element “violated the assumption of innocence and publicly stigmatize politicians,” Release It described the element as “the wrong answer to the correct question.”
European parliamentary leader Roberta Metzola in 2024 has been signed by the central-Valu family since the signed interim agreement, and the BPI’s opposition has been drawn by its political opposition to its political opponents.
“We established an interim agreement (…) to ensure a protocol with the participation of independent experts to respond to the credibility crisis that followed a corruption in the last assembly, so Katargate.
Groups supporting the protocol system now ask for a meeting with Metzola. “He signed the contract and now he has to find a solution,” said Lopez Acile.
