MPSP Judge ‘English Lord’s successor’ SP | Method
Sao Paulo’s Public Prosecution Service has denied a judge on charges of using the exercise of the judicial system and committing a crime of ideological lies. He created a false recognition, with which he took a judicial course, led by Sao Paulo to contest from the Court of Justice and retired. He performed himself as the successor of the English lords. And it is called Edward Albert Lancelot Dad Cantbury Cotarham Vicfield.
Until this text is publicized, the Estado He tried to determine the protection of the retired magistrate, but there was no benefit. The space is still open.
Edward Albert Lancelot Dad Caterbury Caterham Vicfield has lived for nearly 45 years in this situation, asking for a fake of the ID card of Popatempo Da Se until October 3, 2024. The problem is that that year, the digital records of the Ricardo Gumbenton Dont Identification Institute (IIRGD) were already digitized and began to be part of their data system. Automated Biometric Identification (AFIS/ABIS).
AFIS/ABIS has issued a warning. The judge’s fingerprints are like someone else, a particular Jose Eduardo Franco Dose Reese.
When requesting a duplicate of his identity, the judge demonstrated a fake birth certificate, as Wickfield was born on March 11, 1958.
The accused was actually known as Jose Eduardo Franco Reese and in 1973, Sao took his first RG in the interior of Paulo.
Citizen Patense, Born on March 17, 1958. But on September 19, 1980, according to the State Prosecutor’s complaint, Jose Edwardo attended the Civil Police Identification Post and took a document on behalf of Edward Wicfield.
To this end, according to the prosecution, the accused submitted a false certificate of the Army Reservoist, who was the servant of the Labor Prosecutor, the Work Card and the Voter title, all of which were the same false name.
At that time, the basis of the documents did not communicate with each other and the papers were not stored in the electronic system, which was very easy, according to the prosecution, a forgery.
“For unknown reasons, Jose Eduardo Franco Reis Edward Albert Lancerbury Caterbury Caterbury Caterbury Caterbury Caterbury created a diverse personality, but without leaving the real identity, the prosecutor Mauricio Salvadori wrote.”
In 1988, the accused entered Sao Paulo (USP) University Largo Sao Francisco Law School. Supreme Court Future Minister Alexander de Mores is contemporary, in the third year of the course of course. In 1996, Vicfield was approved by the competition for Sao Paulo Judiciary. He retired as the starter of Sao Paulo’s 35th Civil Court in the Zono Mendis Forum in 2018.
After approved in the competition, he interviewed a report on those who were passed by the test. He said he was born in Brazil, but came from the English nobility. He said he lived in England for 25 years, where he had studied mathematics and physics.
The then future magistrate – he was going to work in Limera in the state of the state – after Sao returned to Paulo, he decided to study the law in the USP, although his grandfather was a judge in the United Kingdom. It was assured that the “family precursor” in the competition could not help him. “I know people with a very traditional past.”
At the time he was judged by thousands of lawsuits, a man who had dreamed of complaints and differences in any party, and after years, he was accused of using false recognition.
“The accused is not only creating a unique personality but also leading his life with these benefits. In the way, clearly, forty years, it has been misrepresented for over forty years, it has betrayed the jurisdiction, and, above all, it has also identified the actual operative identity, improving multiple falsehood.”
Oh Estado He asked Sao Palo’s judicial court. By your advice. The court presidency reports, “In terms of a retired judge, the judicial system will not comment on the effects of any belief, as per the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction.”
“According to Article 36 of the Organic Act of the Judiciary (Law No. 35/79), under the provisions of the Item III, the judges will be banned from any communication, with any communication, in connection with any communication.”
The TJ note reported, “Similarly, it is a retired magistrate to talk about the administrative performance of the TJSP at least, at least at the moment.”
In January this year, he received his fake name from public camps R $ 155 thousand – R $ 37.7 thousand in the benefits of more than R $ 120,000.
Now, he is the goal of the criminal complaint from the prosecution, which was provided to the 29th criminal court of the capital, where the TJ reported, “This process is secretly fair.”
With this word, Sao Paulo Court of Justice
In relation to a retired judge, the pending predictions under the jurisdiction of the judiciary do not comment on the effects of any belief, which has not yet happened.
Article 36, Item III, the judiciary of the organic law (Law No. 35/79), the magistrates have banned manifesting through any communication, in relation to the pending actions of judgment.
Similarly, considering that it is a retired magistrate, there is at least the present at the moment to talk about the TJSP administrative performance about the facts.
Finally, it should be noted that the process of citing is the secret of justice.
