The proposed deal is American and the Israelites Gaza … a fixed solution or return …
The books of the crisis in Amman – Gaza are intertwined between the indicators of the immediate diplomatic settlement and the political intrigues that have the scene.
On the one hand, the US administration movements indicate a ceasefire, which may not be not wasolated from handling the rules of the “Peace Agreement”, where the move is not isolated from handling the rules of the “Peace Agreement”, where the initiative is repeatedly reconstructed by the converted copies that empty its content.
In a parallel order, the documents of the Israeli political game, including Foreign Minister Ayman al -Sabadi, have expressed their decision to prevent the entry into Ramallah, which disrupts any attempt to renew the two -state solution and show the depth of the exact infiltration of political decisions.
These advances are not separated from the hidden conflict within the Siona, because Netanyaku turns the war into a pressure card to serve his agenda.
The terrorist “religious Zionism” party came to be a barter to ensure that the approval of Nesset’s approval in the construction of 22 new settlements in the nearby “road 443” is a barter, while Arab ministers are being used as a tool for blackmail for Netanyahu.
This equation shows how the entire regional interests are smuggled to serve internal conflicts, while any belief in any belief is true progress towards immigration.
Behind this complex scene, a basic confusion is highlighted, that is, the American is forced to pay a forefront and think as a way out of the crisis, but the real goal is beyond saving Gaza.
The administration is trying to control Israeli rights, which one in one way to “excessive power”, but does this without touching the structure of the system that develops this extremism.
Here, the lucky question is floating: Can the political bodies that need to be binded into the room can create a standard solution, or is it recycling the eruption crises with the first test?
The abortion of the Palestinian state by a condition
In this context, the President of the Jordanian Society for political science. Calid Shinigat says that the file of Israeli prisoners has a consensus between the Occupational Tour and the United States to unarmed the only political unarmed politics belonging to the anti -Palestinian sects.
Shenigat explained that the plans put forward by the Israeli and the US have been limited to a temporary fight that lasts 60 days, and introduced humanitarian aid under limited conditions, without providing any guarantee in the Gaza Slump.
The plan followed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu focuses on destroying the infrastructure of the Gaza strip, which becomes a non -living part, while strengthening the displacement policy.
Israel definitely rejects any view of establishing a Palestinian state, even if it is a symbolic structure.
Shenigat cited the statements of Israeli Foreign Minister Yisrael Gadz, in which any Palestinian state would simply be a theoretical idea, pointing out plans for establishing 22 new settlements on the West Bank in areas under the Palestinian power, which would reflect any effort to establish a state.
Shenigat explained that the White House’s US projects indirectly repeated the same Israeli goals, as they seek to pressure anti -Palestinian sectors through extensive negotiation strategy.
He added, “Initially, a negotiation article was given, which includes promises to end the war with US warrants, but this was quickly retreated in favor of Israeli paper reflecting the demands of Tel Aviv.”
He continued, “This study includes a temporary quarrel for a two -month period, first conditional in providing prisoners, clear guarantees for withdrawal of Israeli forces or dedicated to the ceasefire after the end of that time.”
He emphasized that this policy clearly reflects the Israeli view, which aims to achieve the biggest gains without making basic concessions, which enhances the continuation of the conflict and weakens the possibility of a reasonable political solution.
Creating a political solution
Therefore, military and strategic analyst Nidal Abu Zaid explained that events at military and diplomatic levels show that the events of the Gaza Strip reveal unhappy efforts to devise a political solution imposed on the Palestinian sects.
Israel was free from the rising spoiler’s embarrassment in a war that Israel reached a dead decision, because its declared military goals could not be achieved, which led to the political agenda in Israel to become a military conflict.
He pointed out that the Palestinian sections would not reject the present -present initiative, which has been approved by Israeli, but their final decision is not acceptable or a definite rejection.
Carefully notification of the situation is aimed at re -improvement of the initiatives of the initiative in its current form, by adding basic amendments to the need for a clear and bonding US warranty for each of its rules.
Abu Zaid noted that Nesset’s approval on the law to build 22 new immigration centers in Road No. 443, Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of the occupation, reflects a political agreement with the terrorist al -Yakni minister in the Salail.
Under this agreement, the western powers of the West Bank are given to Smotrich to retreat from the threat to withdraw from the government coalition against the backdrop to allow the ceasefire initiative.
In the same structure, according to Abu Zaid, 5 Arab Foreign Ministers decided to prevent Ramalla, as part of the bargain and pressure on Netanyahu.
He pointed out that the first week of the pre -blessed Eid al -Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
The US administration seems to be determined to carry out the proposed initiative, “it may be an initiative and similar to the welfare of Gaza, but also an attempt to prevent the right of the extremist Israelis,” the principle of not being able to “impose its view on the basis of not being taken by power.”
A war to improve the political plan of the right
In turn, political analyst Ezmad Mansour, who specializes in Israeli affairs, stressed that Netanyahu has an opportunity to achieve his political goals.
Mansoor explained that Netanyaku is trying to extend the conflict with the aim of protecting the synchronization of his ruling coalition by extending the conflict to strengthen his political plan in the West Bank and Gaza Street.
“Netanyaku uses the war to keep the protection priorities in the interests of the Israeli society that distracts from emergencies such as corruption and economic crises.”
Netanyahu relies on a security lecture to strengthen his power, and an excuse to justify his policies using threats such as Hamas and opposition.
However, this approach faces increasing challenges, especially some Arab countries seeking to get out of this short path.
Mansoor believes that Netanyaku may seek to target these countries or try to embarrass them, and realize that strengthening his power is contrary to any effort to weaken or divide the West Bank.
In spite of these challenges, he pointed out that some influential Arab countries in the region will face obstacles, but he can eventually cross them.
This is the increasing number of visions and priorities and different tables between US President Donald Trump and Netanyahu administration, according to Mansur.
Mansoor stressed that Netanyahu gradually loses the most important pillars of his policy, which is US -backed, which may control his ability to continue this approach for a long time.
