The Law of the 48 Palestinians of their homeland …
The Palestinian Center for Israeli Studies (Mother) in a new report, the law of the Israeli Parliament (Nesset) is a law for the expulsion of the Palestinians into their homeland (or 48), which is a peaceful displacement mechanism for participating in security incidents.
On May 28, 2025, Israeli Defense Minister Yisrael Gads announced that it would implement a law to withdraw Israeli citizens from Palestinian citizens and “support them” and “support them”.
The announcement has come after a closed session conducted by the Neset Committee in the presence of Kats and Home Minister Moshe Erb, where he decided to work in the law against all those accused of receiving financial assistance from the Palestinian Authority.
From the law to the implementation
In 2021, with an attempt by the “Licood” party, “Mother” refers to the “Mother” to march the law for the law “law” to oust the law “law”, in which the Israeli Home Minister has a recommendation that he should be given the authority to give up orders against members of Palestinian families. The project gradually grew for its approval in the Israeli weaving on November 7, 2024, and won the support of 61 members against 41 enemies.
The Draft Act reflects the basic violation of citizenship policy in Israeli law, not to their actions through a plan to discharge Israeli citizens based on their family relations.
The law rules that the Home Minister is given widespread authority to issue a Gaza strip or other regions out of the relatives of the culprits from Israel.
According to the definitions of the year 2016, if they are predicted to the relative’s intention to carry out a guerrilla action, or if they are proven if they are proven, if they are proven, if they are proven, if they are proven, the first -class relatives, siblings, siblings, if they are proven.
Within ten days of the announcement, a legal inquiry is required, and the person involved is given the opportunity to legally defend himself, and the minister will make his decision within two weeks of the session. The law gives the Israeli police the power to use the power to implement the discharge orders, including the attack on homes and the removal of people from them. The period of discharge is determined by a person’s legal position, from 7 to 15 years, 10 to 20 years for temporary or permanent residency holders.
The law is based on the principle of “so -called intention”, and it raises major legal issues because it has a criminal or administrative responsibility for individuals based on their family ties, not to their personal actions.
According to a special session on May 28, 2025, the Israeli government has begun to implement the law, as the procedures have already begun against four people, while hundreds of files have been transferred to the Interior Ministry to implement the law two years after its freezing.
Defense Minister Yisrael Gads said that the government has now adopted a “strict and clear” policy against all those who choose “terrorism”- he said, emphasizing that the “citizenship” will not be granted citizenship, and that the nation will continue inside and outside Israel.
Sana Salama
One of the most important contacts with the law, Etar Bin Kafir, welcomed him, and the use of the law is a victory for his party’s “Autasma Judaid” party, while the execution of the operators should be advanced towards the law of the Operators.
In the same environment, Bin Kafir continued to pay in direct expansion in the use of the law, as he sent an official message to the Home Minister on May 28, 2025, in which Mrs. Sana Salama demanded the evacuation of the accurate Yahya al -Inar and Jagaria Al -Jubidi.
He was arrested by the Israeli police after the Israeli government agreed to open a criminal investigation against him on suspicion of provoking and a “terrorist” organization. Bin Kafir emphasized that the situation represents the situation, as he said, a sample calling for an “immediate action” emphasizes the need to implement the law immediately and gives police support to implement the exhaust decision.
Shin Pet Status: Conditional Support and Warning against Extension
During a closed session conducted by the Nesset Committee in the context of the second and third reading, in the context of discussing the draft law, the Israeli Public Security Agency (Shin PED) revealed a supportive but conditional status. Shin Bed Representatives described the law as a “effective preventive tool”, and the threat of families for the discharge may contribute to preventing the implementation of future activities, by promoting relatives of the culprits to provide effective information for security services.
In addition, representatives of the agency confirmed that earlier studies were prepared by the National Security Council and the Israeli military, pointing out that “the main fear of those who use operators is after the functioning of their families,” from their eyes, from their eyes, explaining the need to create new punitive equipment beyond traditional instructions.
Crystal booking
However, Shin Pett revealed the basic bookings relating to the purpose of use, recommending the palace that is only expelled to parents, because the “educational component” is very responsible for the behavior of the “outlet”, at the same time being expelled by the principle of proportions and contributing to the fuel field tension. One of the representatives of the agency suggested to implement the discharge orders with the dual nation, warned that expanding the evacuation of unilateral Israeli citizens could increase security and political conditions.
Although the law did not openly determine the withdrawal of citizenship withdrawal, Shin Bed representatives declared their support to expand the powers to eliminate Israeli citizenship from people who proved financial or moral support to the port, or they were before its intentions. In this context, they pointed out a significant increase in 2024 of the number of efforts to carry out operations by the Palestinians from Israeli national campaign or residential permits.
Legal and Human Rights Objects to the Plan to Exit Families
The “Mother” recalled that the Draft Act to evacuate the families of Palestinian operational criminals has been confronted with many legal and legal objections. Among the most important of these reviews:
Opposition to Law: The policy of collective punishment may contribute to increasing the feelings of injustice and improving extremism
First: Unprecedented prejudice to the rights of citizenship
The Draft Act reflects the basic violation of citizenship policy in Israeli law, not for their personal activities, through a plan to discharge Israeli citizens based on their family relations. One of the basic constitutional rights that branches from the characteristics of citizenship established by “Basic Law: Human ITY Ravam and Freedom”. Although the law does not explicit the right to citizenship, the Supreme Court regarded it as an independent constitution, which cannot be discriminated against without a very dangerous justification, which provides the validity of administrative discharge without a fair inquiry or a judicial control, which affects the essence of basic rights.
Second: Excretion as a collective punishment that contradicts the legal policy
The law violates a basic principle in the legal system, which means that only those who establish a law are punished. The project allows family members to evacuate because the judiciary has suspected of expressing support or sympathy with a practical culprit, not condemning them or establishing a direct crime against them.
Third: Lack of fair legal procedures
The Internal Minister gives the authority to publish the results without the censorship or a decent criminal trail, the “Mother” mentions that there are no minimum guarantees of a fair investigation in the proposed law, but rather satisfied with the formal inquiry. This is contrary to the constitutional standards that the Israeli Supreme Court has re -confirmed, and it requires the desire of the judicial procedures against the administration when it comes to discrimination for fundamental rights.
Fourth: Any actual security is not based on justification or prevention
One of the most important obstacles is that the draft law is not based on any professional safety assessment, but the excretion proves that the exit is the real barrier of terrorism. Rather, the principle of collective punishment may contribute to increasing the feelings of injustice and promoting “extremism”. The acceptance of radical administrative equipment instead of fair tests is undermined by the Israeli public confidence in the legal system, and weakens democratic foundations in Israel from the view of critics in Israel.
