The Berlin Court illegally announces the refusal of applicants to resort to the border

Published
Berlin Administrative Court It was announced on Monday illegal Asylum seekers on the German border refused, and advised a severe blow Friedrich Mirz immigration policy And the Minister of Interior Alexander Dobrain.
The court ruled in the case of three Somali citizens who were She was deported on the border with PolandWhich confirms that the Mirz government has violated the laws of asylum. According to the court, you cannot Migrant Sin Check your asylum application before.
The Somalis, two men and a woman, were rejected at a train station after they requested asylum in Frankfurt from Oder, east of the country, after arriving from Poland on May 9. The court issued its decision, which is not subject to appeal, after a study Emergency resources It was presented by immigrants.
Judges considered the rejection of foreigners illegal by saying that one of the immigrants is at least Legitimate reasons for asylum asylum. They also added that the general policy of the new conservative government lacks legal justification.
A new hardline in immigration policy
The Mirz government has announced the new difficult immigration policy, which aims to suppress strongly Irregular immigrants. The new initiative promised to completely stop the refugee process, freezing applications and reject the border applicants.
According to the court, the initiative does not comply with the immigration policy in the European Union: Dublin system. According to this system, Berlin is obligated to accurately examine applications and make a condition -from. It also forces each member to conduct a comprehensive investigation to determine the member state responsible for evaluating the asylum application as soon as it is submitted.
“The administrative court’s decision today admits that Dublin’s control must be implemented. This means that border crossing “It must take place, and Germany must verify the member state responsible for asylum,” says Duprent.
“In this decision, the court announced that the justification of our measures should have been more specific. This means that we also comply with this request and provide more detailed reasons.”
The attacks and a feeling of insecurity in Germany
The border controls were an electoral promise of the new foreign minister and the internal trainee. Critical voices confirmed that they are illegal. After the judicial decision, at least one deputy requested the resignation of Dobrind.
But Dobrint insists that the pressure will continue, and he adds that he believes that the government has A legal framework that supports its policy. “By the way, we continue to pressure. We see that the legal basis exists, and therefore, we will continue to move forward in this way, regardless of the decision of this individual issue,” said Duprind.
The new conservative federal government tried to legally justify the applicants’ refusal to resort to the border through a condition of German asylum law And an article from the treaty of the European Union operation.
Article 72 allows member states to suspend the application of European Union legislation In case of threat to the general order. The Berlin Court rejected the hypothesis of calling Article 72, which claims insufficient threat evidence for the country.
Additional sources • EBU