SC Punjab -Haryana’s instructions to cooperate with the Center to solve the problem and provide this advice – Siley Canal Series: SC Punjab leads to the Center for Haryana Resolution

The main steps of the Supreme Court regarding the Chill Canal dispute

Row: The Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered the Punjab and Haryana government governments to cooperate with the Center for a good solution for the old-fashioned dispute over the Sutleage-Yamuna Connection (SAL) canal. The bench of Justice BR Kawai and Augustine George Christ said that the land already purchased for the construction of the canal was not open in Punjab.

Said- such cases cannot be determined only on the basis of law

The Supreme Court has stated that such cases cannot be determined only on the basis of law and that the reality of the land cannot be ignored because other factors with widespread impact should be considered. Citing the recent affidavit filed by the center, the bench said that the center has already taken effective measures to solve the issue with a goodwill.

The instructions offered to both states

The bench said, “In this case, we advise both states to cooperate with the central government to achieve a good solution for the two states.

The center gave this argument

Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Grandmother, who attends the center, said the government had tried to meditate among the parties by holding meetings in accordance with the direction of the Supreme Court. Grandma said, we made efforts to meditate, but the states need to implement their opinion. The concept of the Sail Canal was developed to effectively allocate water from the Ravi and Vyas rivers. The project was planned by the 214 km long canal, of which is 122 km Punjab and 92 km in Haryana.

Haryana has completed the project, Punjab is trapped

Haryana concluded the project in its area, but Punjab started construction work in 1982 and later adjourned. Decades after decades, the Supreme Court supported the Haryana hearing on January 15, 2002 and ordered the Punjab government to create the role of the Chil Canal.

Senior lawyer Shyam Diwan, appearing for Haryana on Tuesday, said the issue was related to the implementation of the issue passed by the court. The bench said that these cases cannot be determined only on the basis of law. We need to consider other factors. A paper order between the two brothers is not as assigned half the land and half the land to the other.

Country and the world’s latest news (There is no message) Read more in Hindi, all the big messages Times now Navbarath Live TV But. Nation (India news) Updates and elections (Elections) The Times is now related to the latest news.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button