Puigdemont defends that “yes” Juns Adviser to OPA to Sabadell was not decisive and asks that the government is now less

Oba Bbva the Sabadil Bank Keeping up after support – with circumstances – from National Committee for Markets and Competition (CNMC) to the aforementioned process, including the vote of the assigned advisor by Juns, Pere Sole. Although The parties and unions in Catalonia oppose this bank assimilationVoice of the range in favor of unanimously. The formation of independence claimed that it was against the hostile OPA of the Catalan Bank, a position that contradicts Soller’s vote. This led the party leader, Carlis BoigdimontTo refer to the internal contradictions of the counselor’s decision, “The Council”, although he justified this “The start of OPA does not depend on a specific vote.”

he The former president De la Generalitat has held this Sunday in “Old” Twitter that Soller’s vote responded to what “he believed best for Catalonia”, although he assumed it Enter “in contradiction” With what he defended his training so far. Nevertheless, he stressed that this vote does not give “more arguments than the Spanish government that it must already stop.” Therefore, he called for the executive authority headed Pedro Sanchez What Let them now stop the processSince support for competition moves the final decision on OPA to Moncloa.

However, Puigdenont does not trust that this happens and has argued that, If the purchase ends with prosperity From Sabadell by BBVA, CNMC conditions will “grant small and medium -sized companies and billiards coverage and protection over other Spanish companies.”

“Competition problems”

He noticed that the fact that it was recognized that “in Catalonia there is a serious problem specifically in the competition.” Select “Resignation” for Soller’s private vote. In addition, Puigdemont believes that this advisor is criticizing, but not other advisers who have been appointed to suggest other parties instead of “They claim that they are against OPA.”

For all these reasons, criticism indicates the contradiction between the advisor and the party, and Their attribution to a “systematic attack” to the formation of independence. “If a problem can be used to attack Juns, all available artillery will be used,” he said.

Finally, he said that his will does not defend “the interests of a specific financial entity.” “We do not have an interest in either of the two at stake.”He ruled.

Last Friday, Secretary -General of Juns, Jordi TrollHe also removed the iron to the feeling of Soller’s vote – against the party’s vision – and defended that they had achieved “Technical Report” collects “serious competition problems” Which can be in Catalonia in the event of absorption of BBVA for Sabadil Bank. Like Puigdemont, the ball was made to Sanchez’s ceiling and government, ensuring this They must be the ones who decide About OPA because it is a “political decision”.

In addition, the Nitrol reprimanded president From Generalitat, Salvador EllaIt was not spoken against the absorption of Cataloni, which is what She accurately returned its headquarters to Barcelona After moving to Alyante seven years ago after the events of October 1, he also said that “there is a great consensus in Catalonia so that he does not have to” acquire Panco Bilbao. “Catalonia cannot lose another bank.”The Secretary -General of the Gontz concluded.

ERC’s criticism of the Juns Minister’s vote

The internal contradictions in Juntus have respected the vote of the counselor have also caused criticism since then Al -Jumhouri left. Party Secretary -General, Ellsena AlasiIt was loaded against Carlis Boigdimon to ensure that they defend Catalonia, companies and workers, and Do not support the banking process. Republican leader warned in a post in “X” about “X” about “x” Support was described as “very bad news”.

Finally, it is also associated with BBVA OPA to Banco Sabadell, Deputy General at the House of Representatives, Vidal eyesInsist on that From your group you will press the government – It is part- so that “it is not authorized”. He has also warned that if it ended, “it will be fateful” and defend “More format and open form” Bank Model ” Not to “repeat” the absorption of saving banks, nor the 2008 crisis.