Pgness changes or variables …
US President Donald Trump’s decision to impose customs duties and the continuation of the Ukrainian crisis, the eruption of the crisis between India and Pakistan, and an safe Israeli approaches, and a secure Israeli approach to the Gulf of the United States of America, or the US President Donald Trump’s arrival. Not only in relation to crises (Syria and Gaza), but also in the complex historical ties with Israel, reveals a fundamental change in the United States.
The visit was with the fourth round nuclear talks between the US and the Islamic Republic of Iran, which seemed to stand on the lips of the abyss. Since negotiations have become the gateway to the continuity of the diplomatic path, or in the entire region, it has invested such moments to improve its security and political status, excluding Israel, as a decline in the entire region.
In Palallel with the Development of the Middle East About the Nature of this differently Differance that disappears with the disappearing conflict and a case tension between two leaders with personal nature?
First: The Arabian Gulf is at the forefront of the new American approach
President Trump’s visit to the Arab Gulf Region refers to a potential change in the priorities of the US policy towards the economic partners and ancient security. The visit gave these partners a priority at the expense of the United States, Britain and Israel’s historical allies, which reflects a new approach to the logic of direct interests.
When he went to the Arab Gulf region, US President Donald Trump went with a clear intention to expand investment alliances and improve the economic dimension in international relations with key figures from his government and senior entrepreneurs and technical predecessors. The US policy is no longer based on ideological alliances or historical heritage, but also based on the use of use of market data and regional stability.
Second: Saudi Crown Prince is a strategic partner in American change
At the center of this change, the role of Prince Mohammed bin Salman became one of the most influential players. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia was able to define a new position as a prominent actor, not only measured by his oil production, but its status in the world economy, its plan for technological change and its investment opening.
US President Donald Trump, who described the “closed economic agreement” in international affairs, has been redefined on the basis of solid partnership and mutual interests, rather than the first visit of his previous decree in his previous order.
Third: Relationship with Israel – Reorganization or Strategic Cracking?
Although the American -Srealie coalition is still based on strong security and military foundations, the last stage has seen a significant decline at the level of political coordination. Many indicators, unlike this situation gap:
1. The dismissal of the US National Security Advisor in the context of contacts with Netanyahu without the knowledge of President Trump.
2. President Trump went to negotiate with Tehran without engaging in Israel.
3.
4. In the absence of coordination with Tel Aviv.
5. Cancel Israel from the Gulf Tour and cancel the arrival of the US Defense Minister.
6. Unlocking secret contact channels with Hamas without the knowledge of the Israeli government.
These advances show that US President Donald Trump has not sought a gap with Israel, but rather a functional condition, which allows regional files to manage the regional files with greater flexibility. This prompted some researchers, an attempt to relieve the full dependence of the Israeli interests, as part of a broad strategic effort to face the rise of China and Russia.
Fourth: Constants of American policy toward the Middle East
Despite the manifestations of the variation, we see that the US policy has not seen a fundamental change in its essence. The US administration is managed by central strategic policies, regardless of the president’s personality, in particular: in particular:
Process is a priority protection of Israel’s safety.
Ensure control of energy resources in the CUR Gulf.
Keeping regional markets under the US economic influence.
Internations support related organizations to serve US interests.
Street is economically merged with the “Grand Middle East” project.
Accordingly, the differences between US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reveal tactical differences from different methods in managing problems based on issues, and are not evidence of the strategic space between the two sides.
Fifth: PGSAD “America First”: Flexible Employment of Allies
In the light of the data of the new reality, we see that President Donald Trump’s policy in the Middle East is the practical use of “America first”, because the nature of alliances without prejudice to traditional partners. We believe that this approach is based on the warning balance between the long-standing strategic targets- to ensure the safety of Israel and strengthen the US’s influence in the Gulf, and accept the greater the flexible activation equipment, including the negatives of some friendly countries when needed.
According to the above, we find that the relationship between the United States and the Israeli company does not go through a separation or gap, but rather that the utensils are subject to reproduction within the existing coalition. This change of the US approach led to the Gulf countries led by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, to improve its existence in the drawing of regional balances, in accordance with the emergence of an investment and strategic center in the new American view.
In this context, we believe that the change in the policy of US President Donald Trump does not refer to a detailed review of the steps, but that it does not mark the revision of their implementation in accordance with rapid changes in the international environment. The United States seems to be heading towards the most flexible and adaptive approach, in which the safety of Israel, to control energy resources, and to maintain its position as the dominant force in the international system, to renovate its allies in accordance with the preferences of the platform.
