Matjdo and yesterday’s unwritten

It was in the speech that Adolvo Suarez Before Franco Cortis defended the Law of Political Societies, and thus gave the first step of the dictatorship -subject explosion. This was on June 9, 1976 A man with a state vision and a good sense He had understood the moment in which his country lived. In fact, this unstable union law was a preamble of the political reform project, which will arrive after three months; An eloquent advertisement of intentions Its author wanted to close with some verses by Antonio Machado They brought a new civil tone to Spanish policy and heard that black and white TV at that time with passion and illusion in nineteen years:
“What is imported in the day! Yesterday is on alert
Tomorrow, tomorrow to infinity,
A man died for Spain or the past
No tomorrow – yesterday – written. “
I do not know what the hands have interfered in this speech or who can choose these verses, those tyrannical services taken from the poem Ibero god This cannot be more suitable for these conditions. What I know is that these words They still have a previous validity for Spain today. I admit that from this passage, the last verse or, rather, that the hint of “unwritten yesterday” that appears in the stretching and final bile position, as if the poet had thought about the last minute in which his existence was necessary, before looking for the decisive rhyme that precedes and closed the verse.
I also admit this, although I was caught a lot, but they had to spend many years You will understand all the deep and necessary meaning. In other words: Was it very important to clarify that it is not only the future, but also the past is written in a unique, official, compulsory and unattractive version?
The answer to this question has made it clear that a political gift in which there are those who have suggested, as a crucial part of their ideological program, Implementing a non -applicable reading yesterday, legislation in history and memoryto; Tell us what we should remember and how we should remember, in the purest Orwell style.
Yes. I think that the verse from Antonio Machado that Suarez closed this speech in 1976 and that he tells us that “there is no tomorrow – nor yesterday – is the best claim against the call Historical memoryThen rename Democratic memoryWhich some intend to manufacture and impose memories collectively. I also think it is sober, both contradictory, to be the best replica of that attempt to write yesterday, or rewrite it, It can be found in the verse of the poet who is now 150 years old Which is the same Re -writing yesterday You also dealt with reading it.
No, not only tomorrow is written anywhere (even on the 2030 agenda Nobody has the right to close lime and song. In the face of those who tell us what we should remember, it is also a way to tell us what we should forget, there is the establishment of a section of our democracy that reminds us that these characters are only one day in the life of a nation even if they create themselves eternally.