Israel has overcome control …
Diss Friedman* – (Dicasifit UK) 5/29/2025
It was a clear indication that Israel’s important approaches were not a brave political behavior by the governments, which Western political leaders, which led to Israel’s elderly actions, were completely departed from Israel and that it was greatly underestimated by Israel.
* * * *
After 19 months after “the right to the right of Israel’s self -dollar”, the main British media seems to have turned towards a new direction (often when Israeli soldiers relieved relief and killing workers in the field of doctors), and to avoid referring to genocide and genocide.
In May, he has seen a number of initial articles in the widespread British newspapers, which strongly condemns Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and is demanding an immediate shooting stop. These articles have repeatedly referred to the “suffering” of the residents of Gaza and the urgent need for the Israeli forces.
It is surprising that this speech will be widely accused of removing the Palestinians by a widely accused, and failing to take responsibility for the British government for its comprehensive support for the goals of the Israeli war, but now there is a completely different tone.
On May 6, “The Vinong Times” attacked the “Silence towards the shameful west to the west,” while the Guardian newspaper wrote angrily on May 20 “Palestinians need actions, not words.”
“The Independent” shouted on May 10: “They finished the silence towards Gaza.” On May 21, Israel’s most supportive Times also saw Israel’s strong support for the Palestinians.
What’s going on? Did the British media find a sudden conscience, which is often reluctant to criticize Israel? Has the Liberation Groups suddenly become the faithful supporters of the Palestinian sovereignty and opposing Zionism?
Consensus
Answer: No. But this dramatic change in the tone is a real significant development, and it reveals two things:
First, Israel is afraid that Israel is increasing its bloody propaganda and its plans for racially cleansing Gaza from its citizens, and Israel’s current situation is seriously threatened.
Second, the unity of Israel seems to be torn apart into a trusted policeman in the Middle East – 19 months of protest and opposition – including some of the largest parade in the history of the United Kingdom.
The report issued by the United Kingdom, France and Canada governments, which has severely criticized Israeli military plans, continued to starve children’s sad images, and that the Netanyahu government did not want to reduce the attack on Gaza.
It was a clear sign that Western leaders of the West, which led to Israel’s elderly actions, had completely deviated from Israel’s control and that it was often underestimating regional stability.
Israel’s reputation
Widespread British newspapers reflect this concern. Analysis of “DiclCit UK” shows that eight openings have been published in “Guardian”, “Times”, “Finnong Times” and “Independent” from May 1 to 25 -all criticized Netanyahu’s actions.
During this period, no initial article on this topic was not published in the “The Telegraph” newspaper – which found the time to publish four editorials about what the British government had submitted to the EU – and the initial article was not published in its power change.
The openings reflect the elite concept of Israel and the basic support of its geopolitical role in the Middle East. The intensity of criticism may be fresh, but a lot of language is still known.
For example, the “Financial Times” criticized the Silence of the West and condemned Israel’s plan to empty Gaza from its residents, but not referring to genocide or genocide. He expressed concern about the lives of the Palestinians, but he expressed his special interest in Israel’s reputation, and he saw that the expansion of the attack would “deepen the stain of Israel’s image and the internal cracks in it.”
Wake up “The Independent”
It seems that the independent newspaper believes that this issue is mainly “in speaking out loud”. On May 10, his call is based on the “Silence towards Gaza” in the hope that the “first moral justification” of the war was lost.
Surprisingly, he ignored millions of people who participated in the parade and took unity to highlight the genocide, instead wrote: “It is time to get up to the world, and demand the end of the suffering of the Palestinians.”
On May 17, the newspaper issued its insistence, “The world must raise its voice against the brutal war that Israel began, against Gaza’s suffering” and the strong supporter of Israel’s military targets, Prime Minister Kir Starmar, “find his voice” (his voice, even though his voice was infected last year. “
By May 22, when the United Kingdom, France and Canada issued a joint statement, “independent” newspaper called for additional actions, but this made it clear: because Donald Trump’s ability to expand “Abraham’s contracts” (recognizing the Gulf of Israel).
The newspaper later argues that “the most firm economic pressure on the Netanyahu government is also an option, but it should never be used to endanger Israel’s existence.”
Israel’s friends
On May 21, the Times took a similar position.
All that has occupied the starters in the “The Times” newspaper is simply the lack of Israel’s “exit strategy”, and the opposite of its brutal aggression: As for the rights of ordinary Palestinians, they do not seem to be significant.
“Guardian” is the biggest change, because it was criticized in three editorials until the date of writing these lines in May, used as “a weapon in the battle of hunger”, and is referred to as “terrible suffering and obvious calls from ministers of ethnic cleansing.”
But the most surprise I see for the first time in an editorial is that the “The Guardian” newspaper explicitly described the situation as genocide: “Now (Israel) plans Gaza without Palestinians. What is this not a genocide?”
This is clearly different from the previous starting articles that exclude the topic. On November 18, 2024, the newspaper clearly refused to take a post on Pope Francis’s call to investigate the allegations of genocide.
On January 11, 2024, in its inaugural article on the “International Court” on the “International Court”, it was hesitant to the same extent, and “the number of judges’s death, the number of public deaths, human suffering in Gaza and the words of Israeli ministers,” “”
Atrocity
None of the editorials of the newspaper – from the reference to the genocide of the “Guardian” newspaper, the “financial hours” of “silence” show – that is, a quantity of self -instructions.
Since October 7, 2023, and even before – to increase the Israeli campaign, the British politicians failed to ask hard questions, for example, military cooperation between the United Kingdom and Israel and the sale of deadly weapons to Israeli forces. He did not show a little moral humility, and did not take responsibility for his roles in the justification of atrocities.
Former friends of Israel, who did not criticize them, and their “newly discovered” courage to condemn Silence, is simply “very little, and too late” (though).
The British media and the Israeli British government are not superficial, but a real embarrassment for Western imperialist interests. To tell the government with strong relations with the government and the truth about Palestine, it is not possible to rely on the media with the weak opposition of Israeli pressure, but this does not mean that the new negotiation in its editorial is not significant.
Instead, the lesson that should be extracted from these recent openings should be the weakness of Israel’s growing position and the weakness of Western governments, as its traditional unconditional support Israel must defend itself.
It should be a motivation to improve unity with the Gaza people through the streets or independent media.
Des Freedman: A professor of media and communications at the University of Goldsmith, London, a member of the Media Reform Alliance.
*This article was published in the UK categorized under the title: Israel failed
