Hardy …
Amman – For months, the Siona has adopted a formal hunger policy in the Gaza Strip, which has been converted not only through blockade and economic hunger but also by the “militarization” of humanitarian aid, and its pressure and field control tool.
Recently, humanitarian and international warnings have increased in this Zionist style, which manages food control in this field, leading to certain areas, in a scene that reflects the assembly in a scene and forced the starvation policies of the daily tragedy, and continued to bomb and expose them.
The “Mass Rafa” massacre, which was made by the occupation forces last Sunday morning, came during the civilization of the public to seek help, called the “American-Physician mechanism” under the microscope of moral and humanitarian charges.
Dozens of civilians martyrdom, and they are trying to protect a livelihood because they are trying to protect a livelihood, and the system is blaming the Zionist occupation, which is used as a “ethnic cleansing strategy”, as part of a “ethnic cleansing strategy”.
Before this complex reality, an emergency question arises: Will the industry succeed in dedicating the principle of hunger through the help of “insurance” to become a tool for imposing mass displacement, and the success of its plan to vacate the field of people?
This question is associated with the fate of this sector, but also the rest of the international values that must be defended during the war, and their tools should not be transported to the proper methods of repression and displacement.
A weapon to relocate the cast of gasons
From here, the political analyst d. Since the outbreak of the war on Gaza, in most cases, the occupation company has sought the use of hunger as a formal means, as the sizes were small and strictly military surveillance when it was allowed to pass through food, drugs and fuel.
In the light of the full decline of the Food Security Organization, conversations indicated that more than half of people face the risk of actual hunger are facing the risk of actual hunger. Since the militarization of humanitarian aid is food, drink, medicine and respiratory movement, what is happening is merely violated by the siege.
It is the imposition of specific checkpoints to enter the occupation aid and control the delivery paths and its time, so that the public can force the public to go between the areas looking for food. This strategy is used as a tool to make people physically tired and psychologically in the preparation of pushing them towards compulsory migration.
Under the control of accurate occupation, aid distribution measures were carried out, and in some cases its distribution centers were targeted, as well as the help became a military target, as happened in Kuwait Roundabout. This type of compulsory displacement indicates that under the pretext of looking for food, it is not accidental, but is part of the policy of the wider company that aims to empty the field of its people.
Conversations pointed out that the aggression began to use the help as a pressure tool, and forcing people to move to the south by limiting its distribution to some parts of the south, which opens the door for migration or sea migration.
He points out that some reports confirm that the Gaza strip is trying to get out of the food, and asks: Will the industry succeed in breaking the psychological and social structure of the Casans with the weapon of hunger?
Due to many factors, including the firmness of the Palestinians, the conversations have emphasized that the entire success of this strategy is still far away, and that Egypt refused to convert the sector into a new file for refugees, as well as the beginning of the International Pressure on the Law and the International Court of Justice.
He stressed that the occupation could not overcome the field and international obstacles, despite its relentless attempts to overcome the proper displacement system, refused to abandon their land, refused to abandon their land.
The opportunity to dominate help
For his part, the political analyst d. Amar al -Sabila, inability to stop the current occupation of the sector, allows the occupation to restructure the human scene in accordance with its own view.
Al -Saabila explained that the company succeeded in dividing the humanitarian aspect of assistance and relief, and it gave a wide area to completely control the mechanism of providing assistance, which was fully controlled by its size, distribution sites and the way it was approved.
This deliberate separation between relief and political or military settlement is opening a way to impose its conditions in the field or the future arrangements of the field.
Al -Sabila pointed out that this reality provides a strategic superiority to Zionist, because it reflects the failure to create an integral approach to the balance between the humanitarian needs of the international community and the failure of the military to stop military operations.
Lack of help with consistency
Political analyst Jihad Harp insisted that he was trying to successfully change the joint mechanism with the United States in introducing and distributing humanitarian assistance to the sector, while maintaining the entire occupation control over the process.
Harp pointed out that this mechanism, despite continuous efforts, could not achieve success depending on the desire of aggression for two major reasons: First, the lack of its consistency; Second, the lack of organizational configuration, which effectively implements the distribution management as desired.
The proposed mechanism opens the way for the anti -Islamic movement, the lack of accurate data, or the useful supervisory mechanisms of the US companies that oversee the distribution process.
He pointed out that the amount of humanitarian need in this field is widespread, which can be used in unreasonable ways, as a result of a long -lasting formal hunger policy, ie no distribution process, which does not depend on reliable records.
Harp continued, the absence of a fair and transparent distribution system can lead to more than their needs, while weak and most weak groups lose access to help. This imbalance may raise the rejection of the community, and may face opposition from the “Hamas” that can take violence in the future against those who cooperate with this mechanism or through the corporate -related channels.
Although this mechanism may be effective in the short term, Harp pointed out that it could become a source of intense crises for a long time, and that by continuing international criticism or distribution of help, it may be due to the inability to monitor its true fate.
He pointed out that there is an additional dimension of this problem, which means that the militants from Hamas suffer from low help flow, reflecting their activities with the prisoners of the occupation, which creates additional security and the humanitarian burden on the company.
