Specialist: PGR reporting opportunity is not adopted by STF

Federal Supreme Court (STF) Professor of Constitutional Law at the Fluminance Federal University (UFF) said that the likelihood of not accepting the complaint of the Rebellion Plan Gustavo Sampio. In an interview CNNThe expert analyzed the current legal scenario and case possibilities.

In the case of criminal actions that originated in the Supreme Court, there are no precursors of complaints.

“There is no example of complaining”, the teacher said that previous cases such as criminal action 470 (called “monthly”) were criminals and acquitted, but the complaint was initially agreed to all the accused.

Defense challenges

At this stage, the expert points out that his clients are facing significant obstacles to prevent defense work to prevent respondents. “It is an attempt with less probability to success,” said Sampio, only at the time of receiving the complaint, whether there are requirements for criminal action.

According to the teacher, focusing on the probable teaching stage of the process, the most hopeful strategy for protection, and the lack of involvement of some of the accused in the alleged crimes.

Accused and subsequent steps

Sampio insisted that there were similar allegations against the Attorney General, including crimes such as violent abolition, rebellion, rebellion, an armed criminal organization, eligibility for the union’s public heritage and qualification for the historical and cultural heritage.

The teacher has concluded that in such cases, the nature of the allegations and the history of the Supreme Court, the possibility of a comprehensive criminal action and complaining to all the accused.

The subsequent stages of the process will be analyzed by various nationalism of the accused, which guarantees that the case will be in evidence in the coming months.