Trump adheres to the Tehran program “Al -Nawavi” to “disassemble”

US President Donald Trump today (Sunday) expressed his willingness to discuss the opportunity to allow Iran to gain nuclear weapon program when he ended his nuclear weapons.

The next day, Trump’s comments on Thran’s uranium enrichment program came the next day, despite the concerns of Western countries, to have nuclear weapons and postponed discussions with the United States.

“I think I am ready to hear it … it is called civilian power, but civic power often leads to military wars, and we don’t want to have nuclear weapons,” Trump said in an interview with the American “NBC” News Network. This is a very simple deal. ”

This is the first comment from Trump after postponing the fourth round of indirect talks between Iran and the United States to be held in Rome on Saturday.

Despite the progress in the 3 rounds, the red scratches have begun to complicate an agreement and prevent military friction in the future. The most prominent in these lines affects the ability to fertilize Iran’s uranium, which demanded that Washington and Tell Aviv be completely stopped. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin insisted that Netanyahu’s Uranium was the “zero Feltilization”, and to sign a contract that would lead to the demolition of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.

On the other hand, Iran says that the “right” of the uranium is not discussed, but Reuters reported on Friday that there was an ongoing debate on the size of Uranium stocks, and that there was a possibility of transporting the country outside the country.

In accordance with the 2015 Nuclear Agreement, the proposals submitted in the negotiations in April (April) to determine the roof of the fertilization level at 3.67 per cent, including three Iran authorities.

Tehran expressed the same sources, according to the same sources, as a preparatory to provide access to its nuclear facilities to the international nuclear energy company. Although Israel and some American authorities are committed to completely dismantle the Iran nuclear program, proposals that transmit a tendency to impose permanent limitations for fertilization without bias to the Iran nuclear infrastructure.

Foreign Minister Abbas Arakzi said in a post on Saturday that “Iran has every right to own a full nuclear fuel cycle,” said Tehran for a long time in the signatures of the nuclear expansion agreement. “According to the Nuclear Dispondition Nuclear Dispandal Agreement, signed countries are responsible for declaring their nuclear reserves and to keep the international nuclear fuel under the supervision.

Since April 2021, the Iranian enriched uranium has been increased by 60 percent, and the international nuclear energy company has said that Iran has enough nuclear bombs at the present time, and that it is represented in 60 percent practice, 99 percent of the enrichment uranium for military use.

Arakji had previously stated that Iran’s right to enrich uranium was “not discussed.” Rafael Grassy, ​​head of the International Nuclear Energy Agency, said on Wednesday that the fertilized materials can be “easily diluted” or Iran can be transported “Iran” or “transported outside”. Last month, Iran’s government spokesman Fatima Muhajrani said the transfer of fertilized materials was “red line”. US Foreign Secretary Marco Rubio said on Friday that Iran, including US experts, should allow searches for his nuclear facilities.

Earlier this month, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that any reliable agreement should “eliminate Iran’s ability to fertilize uranium for nuclear weapons” and the development of ballistic missiles.

With the suspension of American -Iranian talks, despite their progress in 3 rounds, many red scratches have begun to appear, and negotiations will have to be a deal and to overcome them in the future. The most important of these lines is the ability to fertilize Iran’s uranium, which asked Washington and Israel to completely stop. Netanyahu called for “zero enrichment” for uranium and signed an agreement that would lead to the demolition of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.

Iran said the right to enrichment is not a matter of debate. However, the Reuters quotes 3 Iran officials on Friday, shipping the size of uranium stocks and the country outside the country and the number of centrifuges in discussion. According to proposals discussed in the negotiations in April, all groups, including 3 Iran, have confirmed that the Iran’s 2015 Nuclear Agreement will be set up to 3.67 per cent in accordance with the Iran 2015 nuclear deal.

Iranian sources said Tehran had opened the right to reach its nuclear places to the International Atomic Energy Agency. Sources have suggested that these proposals were not aimed at demolishing Tehran’s nuclear infrastructure, as Israel and some American authorities wanted; Instead, the goal is to impose permanent restrictions on uranium enrichment, which prevents the violation of the limits.

“Two -Dissa” route

In this regard, Iran’s National Security Committee member spokesman Aladdin Boruzerdi said that Iran was “prepared to lift all sanctions” when Iran was preparing to accept all nuclear sanctions.

He explained that Iran had a comprehensive nuclear knowledge, but it was adhered to the nuclear expansion agreement, and that Iranian guide was mentioned to the fatwa attributed to Ali Khameni, and Iranian officials were dependent on “nuclear weapons ban”, which was described as a “special guarantee of this commitment”.

Bruges refused to demolish the Iran nuclear program. “The map of the Iran road in the nuclear file is clear and tight”, “The nuclear knowledge containing the country is not subject to gathering under any circumstances.” He said: “Americans know about this fact, and if they don’t know about it, they need to know it now.”

“Nuclear talks are not the same road,” Boruzerdi said. We are committed to lifting all sanctions and returning the Iranian economy to its normal state, then we can accept some quantitative limits on nuclear activities, otherwise things will remain. ”

He hoped that all American sanctions were lifted and “achieved the desired goals of negotiations.” He said: “The countries that repeat this lie, which have Iran’s nuclear bomb, are not trying to own it, no evidence, but the hollow allegations have begun, because Iran’s policy does not depend on nuclear weapons, and our defense depends on the principle of legitimate defense.”

“The biggest obstacle for nuclear negotiations is the pressure of the Geonist organization and the current in American administration.” He said: «If the US continues under these pressure, Iran will protect his interests in all ways. If the US shows serious negotiations, negotiations can achieve positive results.

As a result, Iran told Isna, “I have not tried to develop a military nuclear program with Asfari Isa.”

“We have no objection to the agency’s verification and control activities to ensure that we are not trying to make a nuclear bomb or develop nuclear weapons,” said Asari. He said: “If anyone has evidence that Iran is trying to make nuclear weapons, let him provide it. We don’t have a document that proves it, and we hope that the discussions will go towards the structural and the right path.”

Asfari pointed out that Iran was discussing the “profit – profit” principle, “the method of stress does not work with Iran.” He alleged that the United States and European forces were using the “good police -police -police” strategy, but that Iran was ready to resolve his differences through conversation and understanding, not by threats and orders. “

“These negotiations or any contract should not be built on the basis of threat,” Asfari said. Following this policy will inevitably lead to any result. “He continued:« The United States must realize that Iran has high strategic capabilities, and it is not right to turn this area into a barrel, because it is not useful for the interests of Americans or the interests of the region.

Asfari pointed out that the disruption of the negotiations was not in the interest of Washington, or neighboring countries: “The will of Iran today is to solve the best problems with Americans through conversations with Americans today. However, the main obstacle is to use the pressure process of the tool.

The intersection

Meanwhile, the Tastynim Agency of the revolutionary guards writes that the US administration “is not sure”, asks how to manage the next step in the light of the path of negotiation.

However, the agency felt that the “stopping and confusion” of the embassy between the United States and Iran was the “Expected Trying”, and “the existence of external parties that seek out every way to prevent a good deal”, as well as “lack of confidence towards the American side”.

“New sanctions and contradictory statements of US officers” have increased doubts on the intentions of the United States towards the diplomatic path, “the agency said.

And 3 streams “interrupted negotiations from scratch; first: some of the first Trump administration officers such as intelligence alliance and Mike Pompeio and Polo between the administration of American Democrats, Obama and Biden.” They are exaggerated with the aim of disrespecting the filming of the Iran nuclear program, with the aim of suffering from any agreement with any agreement. Obama administration. “

Second: European countries, excluded from the circle of negotiations, “there she saw there” France was particularly popular in this role. “Last week French Foreign Minister Jean -Nol Barrow had pointed out the warning of Barrow,” Iran “is going to have nuclear weapons.”

Thirdly, she accused the media, “Geonist Entity and its Iranian agents abroad, seeking to” block the agreement “, criticizing the power of Iran.

She also showed that among those who reject the principle of negotiations and those who promote unrealistic illusions such as the flow of negotiations, and also the goal of influencing public opinion, although the 4 decades of struggle does not support these awareness in the light of 4 decades. “

The agency has seen that current negotiations are classified by internal integration and consolidated formal position, with the 2015 nuclear agreement talking to strengthen Iran’s negotiations.

However, in the event of negotiations re -launching or failing, I warned about two internal currents; The first: a group of discussions to lubricate political accounts (not the US is not reliable) or repeating phrases such as warning against negotiations), in an attempt to weaken the government and to weaken the government. Second: A group that has a rule responsible for failure, accusing it with stagnation and adhering to the unnecessary red lines.

Referring to the Iran Guide Ali Khameni’s recommendations, the agency has called for “the national focus on national interests without connecting the country’s duty with discussions and continuously in all sectors.”

Meanwhile, the newspaper “Kaihan”, who is close to the office of the Iranian leader, has asked, “Is there a government to manage the country to maintain the country without stopping the high hopes of nuclear discussions?” “This is the time to overcome the slogans and analyze the actual procedures after over 8 months since the Masoud government started Bouchakian.”

She expressed her satisfaction that the current government was trying to avoid the nuclear deal without fully connecting the foreign policy. However, she said, “Asked many people without clear answers from the government, which increases the suspicion of lack of planning.”

She said: “Last experiences have been proven to be guaranteed and not dangerous to connect with the results of the nations with the results of negotiations, depending on Western behavior based on the lack of commitment and exploitation.” And “the government is at a square: maintaining the previous failed track or demonstrating the real independent attention to build the future,” she said.