What is the Magnitsky Act that threatens Marco Rubio against Alexandre de Mores

Possible app of Government Magnitsky Act USA Against the minister Alexander de MoresFrom the Federal Supreme Court (STF), Brazil is not directly subject to actions, but significantly affects the magistrate’s financial and digital life. According to the head of the US State Department, Marco Rubio, there is a “great opportunity” for Donald Trump’s attack from the government’s attack.

Russian lawyer Sergei Magnitsky, who was accepted in the Barack Obama government in 2012, was a direct response to the Magnitsky Act, which he denied a corruption scheme associated with the authorities and died in custody in Moscow.

Initially, the law was under considerable expansion in 2016 to take responsibility for those involved in the case. With the approval of the amendment, it has expanded its scope to provide restrictions on any person against corruption or serious human rights violations, regardless of their nationality.

From this change, the application of the law is no longer limited to Russia and has become a world, which has been widely used for press actors who are supposed to violate international public rights and international regulations of integrity.

Practical consequences

Sanctions imposed by the Magnitsky Act have serious practical consequences for individuals and affected organizations. When they frozen their assets under the American jurisdiction, goals lose access to bank accounts, assets and investments in the United States and automatically exclude from any of the country’s economy. In practice, this means that even outside the US territory is a blockade of dollar activation, as well as preventing credit cards from American flags.

In addition to heritage loss, the grants are forbidden to enter the United States, which directly affects diplomats, entrepreneurs and politicians. American companies and citizens are legally prevented from negotiating with these individuals or organizations, which separates commercially and politically goals. In many cases, international banks and business partners choose to end relationships, causing damage to secondary sanctions or fame.

In digital environment, the effects are equally severe. The United States -based technology companies like Google need to discontinue or close individual and institutional accounts granted. This includes preventing access to services such as Gmail, Google Drive, YouTube and Google Pay despite used in Brazil or other countries.

In addition, Google, as well as all US -based companies, is legally responsible for monitoring and reporting any economic, digital or contracting movement with a fine of their own sanctions.

The effect of the chain

Although it is an arbitrary initiative of the United States, the application of the Magnitsky Act usually stimulates the chain effect. Many countries that have adopted similar laws such as the United Kingdom, Canada and the European Union are to adopt the American example, expand the limits and increase international loneliness from goals.

This effect is beyond diplomatic: it also directly affects the freedom of circulation, access and the personal reputation of access to economic and digital services. This is certainly a combination of legal, economic and sign consequences, which makes the Magnitsky law a powerful tool against the upper authorities.

According to the text of the law, large -scale violence, illegal execution, forced disappearance, forced disappearance, and cases of serious human rights violations such as arbitrary human rights are subject to grant. In the case of Minister Alexandre de Mores, members of Republican have claimed that there are “extensive censorship and political violence” in Brazil, with the effects of the US.

The attack against Mores gained strength in Washington. In late February, the Judicial Committee of the Chamber of Representatives, equivalent to the Chamber of Deputies, passed a bill that would authorize the minister’s entry in the US and eventually deportation. The text is still required to vote by the Plenary, and now the Republican Party is under control.

Since 2017, since 2017, the torture of opponents, including the members of various countries in Latin America, Europe and Asia, including members of the judiciary, the torture, legal manipulation and institutional oppression.

Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button