Trump has asked the Supreme Court to ban the expulsion of immigrants under the eighteenth century law

President of the President USAWere, and,, and,, and,, and,.. Donald TrumpThe Supreme Court on Friday asked the Federal Judge to suspend the ban on the expulsion of mid -migrants Foreign enemy lawSince the eighteenth century, only in the past was started. This request is one of the most amazing examples of Republican unprecedented attempts to expand presidential authority ever since White House In January.

Trump has announced the “Foreign Enemies Act” passed in 1798 to expel nearly 300 Venezue of Aragua, who was appointed as a terrorist organization in January for a maximum security arrest in El Salvador. President Salvadoran, Naib Bookel criticized the fight against the local gangs for not respecting human rights.

Oh The US government He used the images of the accused of a hand -covered gang and under the El Salvador jail, he was seriously considering the fight against illegal immigration. But some who have been expelled by human rights lawyers have nothing to do with the gang and that even the possible criminals are also expelled, there is a constitutional law for court proceedings.

Federal Judge James Bomberg’s Federal Judge, Washington District Court issued orders to ban new expulsion flights based on foreign enemy law Washington Sent two flights with Venezuela immigrants El Salvador On March 15.

The Magistrate stated that migrants who are subject to possible expulsion are “qualified for personalized inquiries to find out if the law applies to them.” The American Union for Civil Liberties (ACLU) requests an extension of the order, which ends on Saturday.

The first resource of Trump government It was rejected on Wednesday. One of the appeals court judges, from the United States to “Nazis also obtained better treatment” Second World War.

In a petition to the Supreme Court, which dominated the Conservative judges, Trump’s interim legal adviser Sara Harris said the case would be the role of presidential authority and judges.

“The case will raise basic questions on how to carry out sensitive activities related to national security,” he said. “The Constitution gives a clear answer: President.”

‘Summary removal’

Harris argues that the law of the Foreign enemy used in the first and second World War and in the first and Second World War, the “territory of ‘exploitation in the territory, and the authority to eliminate the summary of foreign enemies involved in infrastructure. USA“.

He asked “how to protect the country from foreign terrorist organizations and the risk of weakening sensitive diplomatic discussions Supreme Court This will immediately suspend the district court orders when analyzing the case.

ACLU’s lawyer Lee Gallerant asked the court to continue the decision, “Thereby, based on illegal use and without the pre -eminence of the battlefield authority, and without a legal process, most people are not sent to a unconscious foreign arrest.”

Sky Periman of Democracy Forward Foundation, NGO and Public Policy Research that “is not the King of President” Washington. “He cannot boycott people without the appropriate process and cannot start the forces of war – only three times in history – without accounting in peace.”

Trump attacked Bomberg, and also demanded his dismissal, which publicly reprimanded Supreme Court president John Roberts.

Prosecutors from Venezuela expelled from Venezuela are not members of the Aragua Tren, they have not committed any crime and targeting their tattoos.

Source link