Prior to this Wednesday, commentators Sik, Miguel Morgado, Ongela Silva, Paulo Baldia and Maria Zono Marx analyzed and give a note of Palo Raimundo and Andre Ventura’s installments.
Miguel Morgado
“I gave 2-0, which was the typical result of the soccer game: Paulo Raimundo had no attack, there were no public political positions, and his ideological archaeological science had many vulnerability to simultaneously, his international position and he gave it to the spring. Sometimes we have this vague thing against public policies, health, health, health, health, health, health, health and health.
Ângela Silva
“I think Andre Ventura is clear in this discussion with his most powerful weapon and has received a million votes with this powerful weapon called Demagogazi with this powerful weapon. And I think he can hold his character with some of his voters in this discussion.
Palo Baldia
“My notes are 5 to 3 for Paulo Raimundo, because one of them has two votes with a lot of votes, but there is an ideology that has proven on many sides of the world, it does not work and has fewer votes, but it is a lot of negotiations to the right. We realize that there are things.
Maria Zono Marus
“I gave Paulo 4 to Raimundo. I thought I was clearly bad in the discussion. It seemed to me that he was the only time … it was too or less satisfied, it was just a sentence, and I live in a peripheral neighborhood ‘, because it showed a experience with Paulo, definitely not voted in the PCP.
