Aguar-Bronco says that democracy justifies himself with the results, principles and consensus

The former Social Democratic Minister defended the thesis not to confuse the consequences when analyzing phenomena such as popularity or abstinence in election actions.
The president of the Republic Assembly was considered to be considered today, causing a crisis of democracy due to the inability to showcase and that politicians are not analysts, and that the principles of innocence should not be retired.
In his speech at a solid meeting of April 25, Jose Pedro Aguar-Bronco paid tribute to those elected to the Constitutional Assembly in 1975, in the first free election in Portugal, solved the issue of democratic crisis in Europe, but also in the country, and even in the country.
The former Social Democratic Minister defended the thesis not to confuse the consequences when analyzing phenomena such as popularity or abstinence in election actions.
“The reason – the source of the problem – the most frequent results, talking about the future, building the future and the inability to remain in the chosen of us. What I say is valid to Portugal, but also to Europe.”
After criticizing the difficulties of the European Union in determining and responding to the challenges quickly, Jose Pedro was sent a message to the Agriyar-Branco politicians, saying, “they are not just anchors and reality of reality.”
“Politicians are not audiences of reality. They are the constructors of reality. Citizens will look at us in this way. They have chosen the same,” he warned us.
Jose Pedro Aguyar-Bronco then suggests that politicians have fought the principles and rights of the Democrats that politicians are also degraded even when they retire- “formulas such as the Umption of Umption of innocence”.
“When we promote distrust in the system and its foundations, when we choose to climb the voice of the discussion to imitate such deep disagreements, when we like to look at what we are in the joint and focus on what divides us.”
In short, democracy is weak when retiring the consensus for the president of Parliament. In this part of his intervention, he pushed some examples:
“We can disagree with the immigration process, but we all agree that we need to consolidate who we need to consolidate; we can disagree with the role of the prosecutor, but we all agree that justice is a reform; we can disagree with the state’s role in society, but we all agree that we all agree to modernization and management.”
“We all agree that we need to have political stability – we can disagree with each other, policies, policies and thoughts to each other – and people want it.”
As in the early part of his speech, Jose Pedro-Aguar-Bronco praised the mobilization of citizens for the first free elections in Portugal in April 1975 at the end of his intervention. Citizens assembled to stay in voting tables and “no reward asking nothing”.
“The existence of the existing password, or not even the gesture of public identity. They are not given, they are not given. They don’t even know if the results will be accepted, they don’t even know if they are safe. They will be tortured.
In this case, Jose Pedro Aguar-Bronco has revealed that some citizens in the polling station in the polls for the Constitutional Assembly 50 years ago were invited to showcase in today’s session.
He highlighted the presence of the late former Foreign Minister’s teaching and wife Maria Emilia Brederod Santas, journalist Jose Pedro Castonhira and his wife Lasto Litio. A hint that triggered a long applause.
“Today we celebrate a sense of responsibility of Maria Emilia, Jose Pedro and Lucia and many thousands of Portuguese, there is no error in the country like them. Fifty years later, if we work that democracy, if we are working democracy, someone will make a real feel of great anonymous and civil interference.