What are the “Safe Country” of the EU for asylum applicants?

Advertisement

As a part of a vast EU initiative to change the treatment and responsibilities from its borders in the case of asylum, some are called “externalization”, the Commission has proposed Last week The study of the concept of “third insurance”.

Under the current law, members of member states can transfer asylum applicants to “third insurance country”, but only if they are in contact with the country, such as the previous shelter or family members, but the new project eliminates this need.

Critics say that this action reflects the policy Translate to UK to RwandaIt was considered illegal by the Supreme Court of the country.

German Merna Lena Toppon, who supports this project, argues that it sends the right message. “This is related to one of the last projects we have in the table, which is the revenue plan, in which the process of origin, transport or return to third countries is analyzed.

The Directorate of Migration and Internal Affairs reveals General data, which reveals that more than 400,000 foreign citizens should leave each year without the right to stay in the EU. However, only about 20% are sent back effectively.

However, volunteers and many migrant experts have said that the project raises serious concerns about the basic rights of the people.

“We are not only confused and sending people to any other people who have no perspective or support, but we think this is a basis for human level,” said Olivia Chundberg Dice, an international lawyer for migration and asylum in the EU.

This program says “ignores a person’s wishes and therefore, it is not fair to expect it to be in the country. This cannot be a fixed solution.”

Human rights groups argue that this move will overturp overload the poorest countries.

“Country with a safe look”

Prior to this project, by another project of the Commission, titled “Security Countries”.

The project provides that the seven countries that are considered to be “safe” can be expedited as “safe” from the candidates of the European Union adhesive countries such as Turkey and Georgia.

Some member states such as Italy and Greece already have the national list of safe countries, but the list proposed by the EU is aimed at supporting the most uniform system.

“When the treatment of asylum demands is obviously unfounded for a number of reasons, they are the goal. At the same time, those who do not have the right to stay in the EU, but the goal of it is to ensure that those who are already here are effectively sent back,” Dobontd said.

Human Rights Protection Groups say it is debatable, even though the countries on the list have been appointed as insurance.

For example, The list includes EgyptWhere are you, According to the Human Rights Monitoring ReportOfficials are properly punished by critics and enthusiasts and chasing LGBTQ+people. The commission list has been provided as a “Dynamic” list, which can be expanded or replaced over time.

Countries that fail to comply with criteria will be eliminated.

“This increases the risk of spontaneous and automated arrests in the EU -Far countries,” said Chundberg Dice. “We have seen that in the current EU dedication to countries such as Tunisia (the European Union has a Memorandum of Understanding), we have seen that we are not capable of monitoring and implementing human rights protecting human rights,” he continued.

In terms of the Dees, the projects submitted by the Commission from March said, “They have all the same consequences, which are difficult to access people in Europe and change the responsibility of providing security to countries from the camp.”

Düpont opposite attacks. “Both projects are more efficient, more effective, more effective and more effective by member states so that we can return order and humanity to common asylum and migration to European policies.”

The proposals will be heard by the European Parliament and the European Council, and the agreement of a common speech will be discussed, which will eventually become a law.