Trump does not worship the court’s verdict on the fee, and say, the biggest court stand against the decision, understand what the whole thing is
If the court stayed at the fee, the Trump administration threatened and said that the Supreme Court would go against the decision
Donald Trump: The Trump administration has threatened to take up its fee dispute in the Supreme Court following the decision to cancel the president’s new import duties. The administration demands that this decision be postponed. White House newspaper secretary Karin Levit announced at a press conference that he would win the war in court, and said the administration was working to deal with the judges.
During a conference on Thursday, US President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shikheru Ishiba told reporters that he telephoned on Thursday and exchanged comments on tariff issues. The Secretary of the President’s Cabinet – Secretary Ludenic, Secretary Besant and Ambassador Besant Graire are in touch with their colleagues worldwide and have pledged to the US conversation.
Trump administration criticized the court’s verdict
The White House lawyers filed a petition in the Court of Appeal on Thursday demanding that the verdict be effective. Action has been taken after the second court’s ruling, which occupies his right to implement the fee of President Trump. These decisions were an important success for small businesses and states, which challenged these measures, and hit the central policies of Trump’s economic and foreign policy agenda. Lidid criticized the court’s verdict and described it as an example of the judicial occupation. He argued that Trump’s fees had been introduced to reduce the US trade deficit with other countries, and described the taxes legally correct and pending for a long time.
US team will come to India for bilateral trade agreement
Meanwhile, an American delegation is scheduled to go to India on June 5-6 for the next round of negotiations on the bilateral trade agreement (PTA) between India and the United States. The Indo-American Trade Agreement will be proven to be an important milestone in economic relations between two major economies, which will open new ways for bilateral trade and investment. In addition, Ray Waiseri, former US Assistant Business Secretary for Business Development, said that the trade agreement between India and the United States could not be with Washington’s threatening approach. On Trump 1.0, Ray Vicerri said there was a conversation that was close to the free trade, not the free trade organization between the US and India. One believes this will happen, but this is not going to happen with this threatening attitude of the Trump administration.
President Donald Trump has repeatedly stated that the US has mediated in ending the enmity between India and Pakistan and providing them with many businesses. However, India has insisted that the forces of the two countries spoke directly and that they had resolved the struggle through firing and compromise to prevent military operations. After India destroyed nine terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan, Pakistan’s military operations were invited to eradicate hostility after calling on General (DGMO). In addition, Wickre said the Trump administration had misunderstanding about trade deficit, which the US wants to put fees to other countries.
He said the Trump administration had a misunderstanding of trade deficit. Due to unfair trade practices, trade deficit does not need to be imposed by another country, but this is associated with the savings and cost habit of the United States.
Country and the world’s latest news (There is no message) Read more in Hindi, all the big messages Times now Navbarath Live TV But. The world (World message) Updates and elections (Elections) The Times is now related to the latest news.
