During the trial, the approach said that he went to the attack and that he was a ‘fraudulent report’ target

One day of the Federal Supreme Court verdict, on Tuesday, 22, 22, allegedly charged with defendants, and integrated the ‘Core 2’ of the rebel plot that ended January 8, and the former Director General of Federal Highway decided to leave the attack. In a statement released on Monday 21st, 21st, Silven Vascus aims to support the “deception report to support the intervention in the 2022 presidential election”.

According to Silveni, the 31st Election Zone of the Regional Electoral Court/RN, in the Campo Bom field, produced the ‘fraudulent and twisted report’, a document, used to attribute the corporation to his lawyers, then in the second round he was stipulated at the time, at the time. With the intention of harming the then -Procedor Jair Bolsonoro opponent Petista Louis Inacio Lula Da Silva.

Silveni Vascus is one of the six accused of ‘Core 2’. On Tuesday, the ministers of the Supreme Court’s 1st panel of the Supreme Court decide whether they would open a criminal action based on the complaint of the Attorney General’s office, which was the cause of him five crimes – violently abolishing the Democratic regime, the state rebel, qualified loss and reducing the overturned outrage.

In February, the Supreme Court welcomed the complaint on the ‘crucial core’ and sent to the Bank of respondents Bolsonoro and seven allies. Everyone rejected the relationship with terrorist acts. All in all, there were 34 people who were accused of participating in the rebel plan.

In ‘Nucleus 2’ along with Silvenii, the Reserve General Maryo Fernandez (former number of the General Secretariat of Bolsonoro 2), Marcelo Simara (Colonel of Reserve, Former Bolsoro Assessor), Former Garcia Martine (International Affairs) Underson Torron Olivera (PF representative, former executive secretary of DF Public Security Secretariat).

In an earlier response to the prosecution of the Federal Supreme Court, the lawyers of Silvaini were primarily called the Supreme Court to consider the current case and to judge the current case. They are minister Alexander de Mores, reporter, whom they are expected to declare an obstacle to considering and judging the current case, protecting the impartiality and integrity of the appropriate process.

On Monday, 21st, Silvaini’s lawyers represented the National Court Cooregector’s Office, Minister Mauro Campbell, and the establishment of disciplinary administrative actions, in which Judge Erica Souza Korea Olivera and Judicial Technician Bruno Teaksira were brought into the public.

Until this text is published, the report of Estado He sought contact with the magistrate and coach, but there was no benefit. The place is open.

Representation – Lawyers Anderson Almida, Edwardo Pedro Nostrani Simio, Marcelo Rodrigues, Leonardo Vidal Gerrero Ramos and Gabriel Jardim Teeksira – 2022 – Zone 31/ – The existence of PRF vehicles on the roads, especially in the early hours of the day.

The Silven’s Defense ‘This Report’ specifically depends on the empirical understanding of the polling station authorities, collected by WhatsApp, without scientific method, without access to gross data, without manipulation of official data and deliberate information. ”

“The technical expertise designed by defense analyzed the official logs of the electoral court’s electronic ballot box, and recognized the difference of more than 1,000 voters amidst official data and statistics submitted in the report,” said the former Director General of PRF.

According to them, the analysis concluded that there was no decrease in the morning attendance and the alleged resistance was made based on partial and distorted data. “The vote in the second round of that election was greater than the first round of the 2022 election,” they said.

“As the Federal Highway is registered in the police systems, the Election Judge, Erica Souza Korea Olivera, who is responsible for the Zone, declared that the PRF was individually in the workplace on the second round of the election and that there was no narrowing in PRF ‘performance’.

The defense of Silveni stands in front of the Supreme Court, “The goal of documentary fraud for political purposes, which in fact, attempts to give a demonstration of legality to the article of election intervention with no support in fact ‘.

“The use of this report in the investigation is very serious and is used to justify the Silveni Wax arrest and the inclusion of attacks on democracy,” advocates argued. “In the Federal Supreme Court researchers, Attorney General’s Office and the report for the defect of the petition’s reporter.”

In a basic protection before the Supreme Court, Silveni condemned the crimes attributed to him. His lawyers said, “The facts that have been deducted at the beginning, are clearly distinctive.” “It is noteworthy that the variation of the facts described in the complaint is integrated with its official inability. In short, the PGR is unable to display a clear and accurate narrative, according to Article 41 of the criminal proceeds code, due to the obvious variation of the unprecedented categories.”

“What criminal behavior did the accused commit?” Asks for protection. “The answer is not clear: there is no one. And the worst: the indicator elements covered in an investigation as PGR’s complaint, the burden of proving any criminal reality is that the distinction of behavior and the absence of the obscenity of the obsense of the obsense of criminal laws, or the absence of the obscenity of the obscenity of the obsense of criminal laws, or the absence of the obscenity of the criminal law. Prevents the law from being abused or unequal, which is exactly what happens in the current case. ”